Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC et al v. Couch

Filing 11

ORDER AND STIPULATION REGARDING PLAINTIFFS' APPLICATION FOR ORDER SHORTENING TIME AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AGAINST PROCEEDING IN FINRA ARBITRATION signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on September 9, 2015. (Munoz, I)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 R. Rex Parris Esq. (SBN 96567) rrparris@rrexparris.com Alexander R. Wheeler, Esq. (SBN 239541) awheeler@rrexparris.com Patricia K. Oliver, Esq. (SBN 193423) poliver@rrexparris.com Naomi C. Pontious, Esq. (SBN 288580) npontious@rrexparris.com R. REX PARRIS LAW FIRM 43364 10th Street West Lancaster, CA 93534 Telephone: (661) 949-2595 Facsimile: (661) 949-7524 Deborah A. Klar, Esq. (SBN 124750) dklar@dklarlaw.com 2934 ½ N. Beverly Glen Circle, Suite 761 Bel Air, California 90077 Telephone: (310) 858-9500 Attorneys for Defendant DAVID COUCH 13 14 15 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – FRESNO DIVISION MORGAN STANLEY & CO., INCORPORATED and MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY, LLC, 17 18 Plaintiffs, 19 v. 20 21 22 23 DAVID COUCH, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:15-CV-01291-LJO-JLT O RDER AND S TIPULATION R EGARDING P LAINTIFFS ’ A PPLICATION FOR O RDER S HORTENING T IME AND B RIEFING S CHEDULE FOR P LAINTIFFS ’ M OTION FOR P RELIMINARY I NJUNCTION A GAINST P ROCEEDING IN FINRA A RBITRATION 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER AND STIPULATION REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ APPLICATION FOR ORDER SHORTENING TIME AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 1 WHEREAS, on September 2, 2015, Plaintiffs Morgan Stanley & Co., Incorporated and 2 Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC (collectively, “Morgan Stanley”) filed Morgan Stanley’s 3 Motion for a Preliminary Injunction against Proceeding in FINRA Arbitration; 4 WHEREAS, on September 2, 2015, Morgan Stanley filed an Ex Parte Application for an 5 Order Shortening Time on Morgan Stanley’s Motion for a Preliminary Injunction against Proceeding 6 in FINRA Arbitration; 7 WHEREAS, the original deadline of September 14, 2015 for Morgan Stanley to respond to 8 Defendant’s original Statement of Claim before FINRA is now moot due to Defendant’s filing of an 9 Amended Statement of Claim with FINRA on September 4, 2015. The parties agree that pursuant to 10 FINRA Rule 12207, Morgan Stanley’s answer to the Amended Statement of Claim is due on 11 October 5, 2015. WHEREAS, the parties have met and conferred and agreed upon the following modified 12 13 briefing schedule: • 14 Defendant David Couch will file his Opposition to Morgan Stanley’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction on September 16, 2015 and; 15 • 16 Morgan Stanley will file its Reply in support of its Motion for Preliminary Injunction on September 23, 2015. 17 18 19 /// 20 /// 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 ORDER AND STIPULATION REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ APPLICATION FOR ORDER SHORTENING TIME AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 1 WHEREAS, the parties have further agreed that in the event this Court has not ruled on 2 Morgan Stanley’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction before the close of business on October 2, 3 2015, the parties shall meet and confer regarding extending Morgan Stanley’s deadline to respond to 4 the Amended Statement of Claim. 5 IT IS SO STIPULATED 6 7 DATED: September 9, 2015 By: /s/ Deborah A. Klar (authorized on 9/9/15) Deborah A. Klar Attorneys for Defendant 8 9 10 11 12 DATED: September 9, 2015 13 By: 14 /s/ Blake R. Bertagna Blake R. Bertagna Attorneys for Plaintiffs 15 ORDER 16 17 18 19 20 The above stipulation is approved. IT IS SO ORDERED Dated: September 9, 2015 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill United States District Judge 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 ORDER AND STIPULATION REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ APPLICATION FOR ORDER SHORTENING TIME AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?