Estrada v. Macias et al

Filing 104

ORDER ADOPTING 87 Findings and Recommendations, and DENYING Plaintiff's 86 Motion for Preliminary Injunction, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 6/27/17. (Marrujo, C)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

DAVID ESTRADA,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

v.
TERESA MACIS, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16

Case No.: 1:15-cv-01292-AWI-SAB (PC)
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS, AND DENYING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTION
[ECF Nos. 86, 87]

Plaintiff David Estrada is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action

17
18

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

19

The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

20

636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On April 3, 2017, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and

21

Recommendations recommending that Plaintiff’s request for a preliminary injunction be denied. The

22

Findings and Recommendations were served on the parties and contained notice that objections were

23

to be filed within thirty days. More than thirty days have passed, and no objections were filed.

24

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de

25

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and

26

Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

27

///

28

///
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1.

in full; and

3
4
5

The Findings and Recommendations, filed on April 3, 2017 (Doc. No. 87), are adopted

2.

Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction and/or temporary restraining order (Doc.
No. 86) is denied.

6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED.

8

Dated: June 27, 2017

9

SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2