Estrada v. Macias et al

Filing 88

ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS WHITFORD, VICKJORD AND FLORES TO FILE RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS TO COMPEL RE 56 , 58 , 76 signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 4/3/2017. (Response Filing Deadline: 4/24/2017). (Lundstrom, T)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7

DAVID ESTRADA,

8

Plaintiff,

9
10

v.
TERESA MACIS, et al.,

11

Defendants.

12

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 1:15-cv-01292-AWI-SAB (PC)
ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS
WHITFORD, VICKJORD AND FLORES TO FILE
RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS TO
COMPEL
[ECF Nos. 56, 58, 76]

13
Plaintiff David Estrada is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action

14
15

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
On March 29, 2017, Defendants’ motion for summary judgment was denied as to Defendants

16
17

Garnett, Whitford, Vickjord, and Flores. In the order, the Court directed only Defendant Garnett to

18

file a response to Plaintiff’s pending motions to compel, filed August 22, 2016 and August 25, 2016,

19

respectively. The Court hereby clarifies that Defendants Garnett, Whitford, Vickjord and Flores shall

20

file an appropriate response to Plaintiff’s pending motions to compel, filed August 22, 2016 (Doc. No.

21

56), August 25, 2016 (Doc. No. 58), and March 2, 2017 (Doc. No. 76), within twenty-one days from

22

the date of service of this order.

23
24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25

Dated:

26

April 3, 2017
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

27
28
1