Estrada v. Macias et al
Filing
91
ORDER VACATING PROTECTIVE ORDER AND STAY OF MERITS-BASED DISCOVERY, DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS TO COMPEL AS PREMATURE, AND ISSUANCE OF AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER RE 56 , 58 , 65 , 76 signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 4/26/2017. Amended Pleadings Deadline: 6/23/2017; Discovery Deadline: 8/25/2017; Dispositive Motions Deadline: 10/27/2017. (Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DAVID ESTRADA,
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Plaintiff,
v.
TERESA MACIS, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:15-cv-01292-AWI-SAB (PC)
ORDER VACATING PROTECTIVE ORDER
AND STAY OF MERITS-BASED DISCOVERY,
DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS TO
COMPEL AS PREMATURE, AND ISSUANCE
OF AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER
Deadline to Amend Pleadings: June 23, 2017
Discovery Deadline: August 25, 2017
Dispositive Motion Deadline: October 27, 2017
[ECF Nos. 56, 58, 76]
Plaintiff David Estrada is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action
19
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The original discovery and scheduling order issued on May 4, 2016.
20
However, merits-based discovery was stayed pending resolution of Defendants’ motion for summary
21
judgment for Plaintiff’s failure to exhaust administrative remedies prior to filing suit. The motion is
22
now fully resolved, and the stay of all merits-based discovery is vacated. Because discovery was
23
stayed, there are outstanding discovery requests and motions to compel to be addressed by Defendants.
24
(See ECF Nos. 53, 56, 58, 76.) Plaintiff’s outstanding discovery requests shall be deemed served as of
25
the date of this order and shall be responded to within the forty-five (45) days. In light of the fact that
26
only certain Defendants remain in the action after resolution of the exhaustion-related motion for
27
summary judgment and have not yet filed a response to the discovery requests, Plaintiff’s pending
28
motions to compel, ECF Nos. 56, 58, 76, are DENIED as premature and may be re-filed, if necessary.
1
1
2
Accordingly, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 1, 16, and 26-36, discovery shall
proceed as follows:
3
Discovery Procedures:
4
1.
Discovery requests shall be served by the parties pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
5
Procedure 5 and Local Rule 135. Discovery requests and responses shall not be filed with the Court
6
unless required by Local Rules 250.2, 2503 and 250.4.
7
2.
Responses to written discovery requests shall be due forty-five (45) days after the
8
request is first served. Boilerplate objections are disfavored and may be summarily overruled by the
9
Court. Responses to document requests shall include all documents within a party’s possession,
10
custody or control. Fed. R. Civ. P. 34(a)(1). Documents are deemed within a party’s possession,
11
custody or control if the party has actual possession, custody or control thereof, or the legal right to
12
obtain the property on demand. Amendments to discovery responses served after the filing of and in
13
response to a motion to compel are strongly disfavored, absent good faith. The parties are required to
14
act in good faith during the course of discovery and the failure to do so may result in the payment of
15
expenses pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(a)(5) or other appropriate sanctions
16
authorized by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the Local Rules.
17
3.
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(a)(2)(B), Defendant may depose
18
Plaintiff and any other witness confined in a prison upon condition that, at least fourteen (14) days
19
before such a deposition, Defendant serves all parties with the notice required by Federal Rule of Civil
20
Procedure 30(b)(1). Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(4), the parties may take any
21
deposition under this section by video conference without a further motion or order of the Court.
22
Nothing herein forecloses a party from bringing a motion for protective order pursuant to Federal Rule
23
of Civil Procedure 26(c)(1) if necessary.
24
4.
If discovery disputes arise, the parties shall comply with all pertinent rules including
25
Rules 5, 7, 11, 26, and 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Rules 110, 130, 131, 133, 135,
26
142, 144, and 230(l) of the Local Rules of Practice for the United States District Court, Eastern
27
District of California. A discovery motion that does not comply with applicable rules will be stricken
28
and may result in imposition of sanctions. However, unless otherwise ordered, Local Rule 251 shall
2
1
not apply, and the requirement set forth in Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26 and 37 of a good faith
2
conference or attempt to confer with the other party to resolve the dispute shall not apply. Voluntary
3
compliance with this provision of Rules 26 and 37 is encouraged, and if the Court deems it appropriate
4
in any given case, it will reimpose the good faith meet and confer requirement. A moving party
5
should not seek to compel production of documents which are equally available to the moving party,
6
such as documents in plaintiff’s central file.
7
Amendment to Pleadings:
8
5.
9
Filing Deadlines:
6.
10
The deadline for amending the pleadings is June 23, 2017.
The deadline for the completion of all discovery, including filing all motions to compel
11
discovery, is August 25, 2017. Absent good cause, discovery motions will not be considered if filed
12
after the discovery deadline. Therefore, discovery requests and deposition notices must be served
13
sufficiently in advance of the discovery deadline to permit time for a response and time to prepare and
14
file a motion to compel.
8.
15
16
judgment for failure to exhaust) is October 27, 2017.
9.
17
18
The deadline for filing all dispositive motions (other than a motion for summary
A request for an extension of a deadline set in this order must be filed on or before
the expiration of the deadline in question and will only be granted on a showing of good cause.
19
20
21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
22
Dated:
23
April 26, 2017
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?