Simpson v. Ahlin
Filing
7
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why This Action Should Not be Dismissed for Failure to State a Claim, Failure to Obey a Court Order, and Failure to Prosecute, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 10/27/16. Show Cause Response Due Within Twenty Days. (Marrujo, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
EARL SIMPSON,
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Plaintiff,
v.
PAM AHLIN,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:15-cv-01301-BAM (PC)
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE
TO STATE A CLAIM, FAILURE TO OBEY A
COURT ORDER, AND FAILURE TO
PROSECUTE
(ECF No. 6)
TWENTY (20) DAY DEADLINE
Plaintiff Earl Simpson (“Plaintiff”) is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis
in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
21
On September 16, 2016, the Court dismissed Plaintiff’s complaint with leave to amend within
22
thirty (30) days. (ECF No. 6.) Plaintiff was expressly warned that the failure to file an amended
23
complaint in compliance with the Court’s order would result in this action being dismissed, with
24
prejudice, for failure to obey a court order and failure to state a claim. (Id. at pp. 5-6.) The deadline
25
for Plaintiff to file an amended complaint or a notice of voluntary dismissal has passed, and he has not
26
complied with or otherwise responded to the Court’s order.
27
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall show cause, within twenty (20)
28
days of service of this order, why this action should not be dismissed based on Plaintiff’s failure to
1
1
comply with the Court’s September 16, 2016 order, and for his failure to state a claim and failure to
2
prosecute.
3
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Barbara
October 27, 2016
A. McAuliffe
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?