Estate of Christopher McDaniel, et al. v. County of Kern, et al.
Filing
23
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 12/15/2015. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
THERESA A. GOLDNER, COUNTY COUNSEL
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
By: Marshall S. Fontes, Deputy (SBN 139567)
Kathleen S. Rivera. Deputy (SBN 211606)
Kern County Administrative Center
1115 Truxtun Avenue, Fourth Floor
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Telephone 661-868-3800
Fax 661-868-3805
Attorneys for Defendants, County of Kern,
Kern County Sheriff’s Department,
Aaron Warmerdam and Jeffrey Kelly
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13
14
THE ESTATE OF CHRISTOPHER
MCDANIEL, ET AL.,
Plaintiff,
15
16
17
CASE NO. 1:15-cv-01320-JAM-JLT
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
FOR DISCOVERY MATTERS
v.
COUNTY OF KERN, ET AL.
18
Defendants.
19
20
21
COME NOW, all Plaintiffs and all Defendants (hereinafter the “Parties”) to this
matter, and agree and stipulate to a Protective Order, as follows:
22
1.
WHEREAS it is anticipated that Plaintiffs will request portions of the
23
private personnel records of law enforcement members of the Kern County Sheriff’s
24
Office (“KCSO”), which qualify as peace officer records under California Penal Code
25
§§ 832.7 and 832.8, and KCSO will be requested to produce the records in discovery;
26
2.
WHEREAS the parties agree that discovery of the private personnel
27
records of law enforcement members of the KCSO may be relevant to this action;
28
///
1
______________________________________________________________________
Stipulated Protective Order for Discovery Matters
1
3.
WHEREAS Defendants are concerned that turning over the KCSO
2
private personnel records without a protective order could result in the violation of the
3
privacy rights of KCSO Deputies including but not limited to those who are parties to
4
this litigation;
5
4.
WHEREAS the parties agree that a Stipulated Protective Order is
6
necessary to balance Plaintiffs’ need for relevant discovery, KCSO’s duty as steward
7
of the records, and the privacy rights of the KCSO Deputies including but not limited to
8
those who are parties to this litigation;
9
5.
WHEREAS it is anticipated that Plaintiffs will request portions of the
10
investigation reports, records and evidence, including coroner’s records and autopsy
11
photos prepared during the investigation of the underlying incident by law enforcement
12
members of the Kern County Sheriff’s Office (hereinafter “investigation records”), and
13
KCSO will be requested to produce the records in discovery;
14
15
16
6.
WHEREAS the parties agree that discovery of the investigation records
may be relevant to this action;
7.
WHEREAS Defendants are concerned that turning over the investigation
17
records without a protective order could result in the violation of the privacy rights of
18
witnesses, Decedent, Plaintiffs and/or KCSO Deputies including, but not limited to,
19
those who are parties to this litigation, and of the investigation privilege;
20
8.
WHEREAS the parties agree that a Stipulated Protective Order is
21
necessary to balance Plaintiffs’ need for relevant discovery, KCSO’s duty as steward
22
of the records, and the privacy rights of witnesses, Decedent, Plaintiffs and/or KCSO
23
Deputies including, but not limited to, those who are parties to this litigation;
24
9.
WHEREAS it is anticipated that Defendants may request portions of the
25
private financial, medical and psychological records of Decedent and Plaintiffs, and
26
Plaintiffs may be requested to produce the records in discovery;
27
28
10.
WHEREAS the parties agree that discovery of the private financial,
medical and psychological records of Decedent may be relevant to this action;
2
______________________________________________________________________
Stipulated Protective Order for Discovery Matters
1
11.
WHEREAS Plaintiffs are concerned that turning over the private
2
financial, medical and psychological records of Decedent without a protective order
3
may result in the violation of the privacy rights of Plaintiffs;
4
12.
WHEREAS the parties agree that a Stipulated Protective Order is
5
necessary to balance Defendants’ need for relevant discovery of Decedent’s private
6
medical and psychological records, and Plaintiffs’ desire to prevent unwarranted
7
disclosure of Decedent’s medical and psychological records;
8
9
10
11
12
13
13.
WHEREAS it is anticipated that Defendants may request portions of the
private records of each Plaintiff, and each Plaintiff may be requested to produce the
records in discovery;
14.
WHEREAS the parties agree that discovery of the private records of
Decedent may be relevant to this action;
15.
WHEREAS Plaintiffs are concerned that turning over the private records
14
of each Plaintiff without a protective order could result in the violation of the privacy
15
rights of Plaintiffs;
16
16.
WHEREAS the parties agree that a Stipulated Protective Order is
17
necessary to balance Defendants’ need for relevant discovery and each Plaintiff’s
18
desire to prevent unwarranted disclosure of their private records;
19
SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THIS COURT, THE PARTIES HEREBY
20
STIPULATE TO THE FOLLOWING PROTECTIVE ORDER:
21
17.
In connection with discovery proceedings in this action, the parties
22
designate the KCSO’s personnel records regarding their Deputies including, but not
23
limited to, those who are parties to this litigation, as CONFIDENTIAL.
24
18.
25
designate
26
CONFIDENTIAL.
27
19.
28
In connection with discovery proceedings in this action, the parties
the
Decedent’s
financial,
medical
and
psychological
records
as
In connection with discovery proceedings in this action, the parties
designate the investigation reports, records and evidence prepared during the
3
______________________________________________________________________
Stipulated Protective Order for Discovery Matters
1
investigation of the underlying incident by law enforcement members of the Kern
2
County Sheriff’s Office, which is not otherwise available to the public through a public
3
records request, as CONFIDENTIAL.
4
20.
By designating the above matters as CONFIDENTIAL, the Parties certify
5
to the Court that there is a good faith basis both in law and in fact for the designations
6
within the meaning of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c).
7
21.
Material designated as CONFIDENTIAL under this Order, the information
8
contained therein, and any summaries, copies, abstracts, or other documents derived
9
in whole or in part from material designated as confidential shall be used only for the
10
purpose of the prosecution, defense, or settlement of this action and for no other
11
purpose.
12
22.
CONFIDENTIAL material produced pursuant to this Order may be
13
disclosed or made available only to the Court, to counsel for a party (including the
14
paralegal, clerical, and secretarial staff employed by such counsel), and to the
15
“qualified persons” designated below:
16
(a)
17
18
a named party, to which only CONFIDENTIAL material specifically
related to the named party shall be disclosed;
(b)
experts and/or consultants (together with their clerical staff) retained by
19
such counsel to assist in the prosecution, defense or settlement of this
20
action;
21
(c)
court reporter(s) employed in this action;
22
(d)
a witness at any deposition or other proceeding in this action; and
23
(e)
any other person as to whom the parties in writing agree.
24
23.
CONFIDENTIAL material shall not be provided to the news media
25
26
directly or indirectly in any form or manner.
24.
For purposes of Defendants’ initial responses to Plaintiffs’ production
27
request, the parties agree that Defendants may exclude [redact] from the production
28
the names, addresses, telephone numbers and other personal contact information of
4
______________________________________________________________________
Stipulated Protective Order for Discovery Matters
1
any non-party Deputy, provided that the identified Deputy is not a first person witness,
2
report writer and/or an investigator of Plaintiffs’ complaints.
3
25.
In the event of a disputed factual issue as to the preceding paragraph,
4
and Plaintiffs deem it necessary to discover the identities and personal contact
5
information of a non-party Deputy’s information, excluded under the preceding
6
paragraph, Plaintiffs’ counsel will notify Defendants’ counsels of their intent in writing
7
to seek such personal information. If after five (5) days the parties are unable to reach
8
an agreement on production of the non-party Deputy’s information, then Plaintiffs may
9
make an application to the Court for an order to resolve the dispute.
10
26.
Nothing herein shall impose any restrictions on the use or disclosure by
11
a party of material obtained by such party independent of the discovery process in this
12
action, whether or not such material is also obtained through discovery in this action.
13
14
15
27.
If a party wishes to file documents with the Court, which contain material
designated as confidential, the party shall comply with Local Rules 140 and 141.
28.
This Order shall be without prejudice to the right of the parties (a) to
16
bring before the Court at any time the question of whether any particular document or
17
information is confidential or whether its use should be restricted or (b) to present a
18
motion to the Court under FRCP 26(c) for a separate protective order as to any
19
particular document or information, including restrictions differing from those as
20
specified herein. This Order shall not be deemed to prejudice the parties in any way in
21
any future application for modification of this Order.
22
29.
This Order is entered solely for the purpose of facilitating the exchange
23
of documents and information between the parties to this action without involving the
24
Court unnecessarily in the process. Nothing in this Order, or in the production of any
25
information or document under the terms of this Order, or any proceedings pursuant to
26
this Order, shall be deemed to have the effect of an admission or waiver by either
27
party or of altering the confidentiality or non-confidentiality of any such document or
28
information or altering any existing obligation of any party or the absence thereof.
5
______________________________________________________________________
Stipulated Protective Order for Discovery Matters
1
30.
This Order shall survive the final termination of this action, to the extent
2
that the information contained in Confidential Material is not or does not become
3
known to the public, and the Court shall retain jurisdiction to resolve any dispute
4
concerning the use of information disclosed hereunder;
5
31.
Upon termination of this case, counsel for each Party shall assemble and
6
return to opposing counsel all documents, material and deposition transcripts
7
designated as confidential and all copies of same, or shall certify the destruction
8
thereof.
9
10
32.
Any person, or persons, violating this order shall be subject to sanctions
and all attorney’s fees and costs associated with any related motion.
11
12
Dated: December 15, 2015
LAW OFFICE OF MICHAEL J. CURLS
13
14
By:
15
16
/s/ Nichelle D. Jones
Michael J. Curls, Esq.
Nichelle D. Jones, Esq.
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
.
17
18
19
Dated: December 15, 2015
THERESA A. GOLDNER,
COUNTY COUNSEL
20
21
22
23
By:
/s/ Kathleen Rivera
Marshall S. Fontes, Esq.
Kathleen Rivera, Esq.
Attorneys for Defendants
.
24
25
26
27
28
6
______________________________________________________________________
Stipulated Protective Order for Discovery Matters
1
2
3
ORDER
The parties having stipulated thereto and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS
THEREFORE ORDERED.
4
5
6
Dated: 12/15/2015
/s/ John A. Mendez____________________
JOHN A. MENDEZ,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
7
______________________________________________________________________
Stipulated Protective Order for Discovery Matters
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?