Estate of Christopher McDaniel, et al. v. County of Kern, et al.

Filing 23

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 12/15/2015. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 THERESA A. GOLDNER, COUNTY COUNSEL STATE OF CALIFORNIA By: Marshall S. Fontes, Deputy (SBN 139567) Kathleen S. Rivera. Deputy (SBN 211606) Kern County Administrative Center 1115 Truxtun Avenue, Fourth Floor Bakersfield, CA 93301 Telephone 661-868-3800 Fax 661-868-3805 Attorneys for Defendants, County of Kern, Kern County Sheriff’s Department, Aaron Warmerdam and Jeffrey Kelly 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 14 THE ESTATE OF CHRISTOPHER MCDANIEL, ET AL., Plaintiff, 15 16 17 CASE NO. 1:15-cv-01320-JAM-JLT STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR DISCOVERY MATTERS v. COUNTY OF KERN, ET AL. 18 Defendants. 19 20 21 COME NOW, all Plaintiffs and all Defendants (hereinafter the “Parties”) to this matter, and agree and stipulate to a Protective Order, as follows: 22 1. WHEREAS it is anticipated that Plaintiffs will request portions of the 23 private personnel records of law enforcement members of the Kern County Sheriff’s 24 Office (“KCSO”), which qualify as peace officer records under California Penal Code 25 §§ 832.7 and 832.8, and KCSO will be requested to produce the records in discovery; 26 2. WHEREAS the parties agree that discovery of the private personnel 27 records of law enforcement members of the KCSO may be relevant to this action; 28 /// 1 ______________________________________________________________________ Stipulated Protective Order for Discovery Matters 1 3. WHEREAS Defendants are concerned that turning over the KCSO 2 private personnel records without a protective order could result in the violation of the 3 privacy rights of KCSO Deputies including but not limited to those who are parties to 4 this litigation; 5 4. WHEREAS the parties agree that a Stipulated Protective Order is 6 necessary to balance Plaintiffs’ need for relevant discovery, KCSO’s duty as steward 7 of the records, and the privacy rights of the KCSO Deputies including but not limited to 8 those who are parties to this litigation; 9 5. WHEREAS it is anticipated that Plaintiffs will request portions of the 10 investigation reports, records and evidence, including coroner’s records and autopsy 11 photos prepared during the investigation of the underlying incident by law enforcement 12 members of the Kern County Sheriff’s Office (hereinafter “investigation records”), and 13 KCSO will be requested to produce the records in discovery; 14 15 16 6. WHEREAS the parties agree that discovery of the investigation records may be relevant to this action; 7. WHEREAS Defendants are concerned that turning over the investigation 17 records without a protective order could result in the violation of the privacy rights of 18 witnesses, Decedent, Plaintiffs and/or KCSO Deputies including, but not limited to, 19 those who are parties to this litigation, and of the investigation privilege; 20 8. WHEREAS the parties agree that a Stipulated Protective Order is 21 necessary to balance Plaintiffs’ need for relevant discovery, KCSO’s duty as steward 22 of the records, and the privacy rights of witnesses, Decedent, Plaintiffs and/or KCSO 23 Deputies including, but not limited to, those who are parties to this litigation; 24 9. WHEREAS it is anticipated that Defendants may request portions of the 25 private financial, medical and psychological records of Decedent and Plaintiffs, and 26 Plaintiffs may be requested to produce the records in discovery; 27 28 10. WHEREAS the parties agree that discovery of the private financial, medical and psychological records of Decedent may be relevant to this action; 2 ______________________________________________________________________ Stipulated Protective Order for Discovery Matters 1 11. WHEREAS Plaintiffs are concerned that turning over the private 2 financial, medical and psychological records of Decedent without a protective order 3 may result in the violation of the privacy rights of Plaintiffs; 4 12. WHEREAS the parties agree that a Stipulated Protective Order is 5 necessary to balance Defendants’ need for relevant discovery of Decedent’s private 6 medical and psychological records, and Plaintiffs’ desire to prevent unwarranted 7 disclosure of Decedent’s medical and psychological records; 8 9 10 11 12 13 13. WHEREAS it is anticipated that Defendants may request portions of the private records of each Plaintiff, and each Plaintiff may be requested to produce the records in discovery; 14. WHEREAS the parties agree that discovery of the private records of Decedent may be relevant to this action; 15. WHEREAS Plaintiffs are concerned that turning over the private records 14 of each Plaintiff without a protective order could result in the violation of the privacy 15 rights of Plaintiffs; 16 16. WHEREAS the parties agree that a Stipulated Protective Order is 17 necessary to balance Defendants’ need for relevant discovery and each Plaintiff’s 18 desire to prevent unwarranted disclosure of their private records; 19 SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THIS COURT, THE PARTIES HEREBY 20 STIPULATE TO THE FOLLOWING PROTECTIVE ORDER: 21 17. In connection with discovery proceedings in this action, the parties 22 designate the KCSO’s personnel records regarding their Deputies including, but not 23 limited to, those who are parties to this litigation, as CONFIDENTIAL. 24 18. 25 designate 26 CONFIDENTIAL. 27 19. 28 In connection with discovery proceedings in this action, the parties the Decedent’s financial, medical and psychological records as In connection with discovery proceedings in this action, the parties designate the investigation reports, records and evidence prepared during the 3 ______________________________________________________________________ Stipulated Protective Order for Discovery Matters 1 investigation of the underlying incident by law enforcement members of the Kern 2 County Sheriff’s Office, which is not otherwise available to the public through a public 3 records request, as CONFIDENTIAL. 4 20. By designating the above matters as CONFIDENTIAL, the Parties certify 5 to the Court that there is a good faith basis both in law and in fact for the designations 6 within the meaning of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c). 7 21. Material designated as CONFIDENTIAL under this Order, the information 8 contained therein, and any summaries, copies, abstracts, or other documents derived 9 in whole or in part from material designated as confidential shall be used only for the 10 purpose of the prosecution, defense, or settlement of this action and for no other 11 purpose. 12 22. CONFIDENTIAL material produced pursuant to this Order may be 13 disclosed or made available only to the Court, to counsel for a party (including the 14 paralegal, clerical, and secretarial staff employed by such counsel), and to the 15 “qualified persons” designated below: 16 (a) 17 18 a named party, to which only CONFIDENTIAL material specifically related to the named party shall be disclosed; (b) experts and/or consultants (together with their clerical staff) retained by 19 such counsel to assist in the prosecution, defense or settlement of this 20 action; 21 (c) court reporter(s) employed in this action; 22 (d) a witness at any deposition or other proceeding in this action; and 23 (e) any other person as to whom the parties in writing agree. 24 23. CONFIDENTIAL material shall not be provided to the news media 25 26 directly or indirectly in any form or manner. 24. For purposes of Defendants’ initial responses to Plaintiffs’ production 27 request, the parties agree that Defendants may exclude [redact] from the production 28 the names, addresses, telephone numbers and other personal contact information of 4 ______________________________________________________________________ Stipulated Protective Order for Discovery Matters 1 any non-party Deputy, provided that the identified Deputy is not a first person witness, 2 report writer and/or an investigator of Plaintiffs’ complaints. 3 25. In the event of a disputed factual issue as to the preceding paragraph, 4 and Plaintiffs deem it necessary to discover the identities and personal contact 5 information of a non-party Deputy’s information, excluded under the preceding 6 paragraph, Plaintiffs’ counsel will notify Defendants’ counsels of their intent in writing 7 to seek such personal information. If after five (5) days the parties are unable to reach 8 an agreement on production of the non-party Deputy’s information, then Plaintiffs may 9 make an application to the Court for an order to resolve the dispute. 10 26. Nothing herein shall impose any restrictions on the use or disclosure by 11 a party of material obtained by such party independent of the discovery process in this 12 action, whether or not such material is also obtained through discovery in this action. 13 14 15 27. If a party wishes to file documents with the Court, which contain material designated as confidential, the party shall comply with Local Rules 140 and 141. 28. This Order shall be without prejudice to the right of the parties (a) to 16 bring before the Court at any time the question of whether any particular document or 17 information is confidential or whether its use should be restricted or (b) to present a 18 motion to the Court under FRCP 26(c) for a separate protective order as to any 19 particular document or information, including restrictions differing from those as 20 specified herein. This Order shall not be deemed to prejudice the parties in any way in 21 any future application for modification of this Order. 22 29. This Order is entered solely for the purpose of facilitating the exchange 23 of documents and information between the parties to this action without involving the 24 Court unnecessarily in the process. Nothing in this Order, or in the production of any 25 information or document under the terms of this Order, or any proceedings pursuant to 26 this Order, shall be deemed to have the effect of an admission or waiver by either 27 party or of altering the confidentiality or non-confidentiality of any such document or 28 information or altering any existing obligation of any party or the absence thereof. 5 ______________________________________________________________________ Stipulated Protective Order for Discovery Matters 1 30. This Order shall survive the final termination of this action, to the extent 2 that the information contained in Confidential Material is not or does not become 3 known to the public, and the Court shall retain jurisdiction to resolve any dispute 4 concerning the use of information disclosed hereunder; 5 31. Upon termination of this case, counsel for each Party shall assemble and 6 return to opposing counsel all documents, material and deposition transcripts 7 designated as confidential and all copies of same, or shall certify the destruction 8 thereof. 9 10 32. Any person, or persons, violating this order shall be subject to sanctions and all attorney’s fees and costs associated with any related motion. 11 12 Dated: December 15, 2015 LAW OFFICE OF MICHAEL J. CURLS 13 14 By: 15 16 /s/ Nichelle D. Jones Michael J. Curls, Esq. Nichelle D. Jones, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiffs . 17 18 19 Dated: December 15, 2015 THERESA A. GOLDNER, COUNTY COUNSEL 20 21 22 23 By: /s/ Kathleen Rivera Marshall S. Fontes, Esq. Kathleen Rivera, Esq. Attorneys for Defendants . 24 25 26 27 28 6 ______________________________________________________________________ Stipulated Protective Order for Discovery Matters 1 2 3 ORDER The parties having stipulated thereto and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED. 4 5 6 Dated: 12/15/2015 /s/ John A. Mendez____________________ JOHN A. MENDEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 7 ______________________________________________________________________ Stipulated Protective Order for Discovery Matters

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?