Provencio v. Lizzarraga

Filing 21

ORDER REQUIRING Respondent to Lodge Additional State Court Records, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 9/13/17. Thirty Day Deadline. (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 ALFRED PROVENCIO, 10 Petitioner, 11 12 v. SHAWN HATTON, Warden Case No. 1:15-cv-01327-LJO-MJS (HC) ORDER REQUIRING RESPONDENT TO LODGE ADDITIONAL STATE COURT RECORDS THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE Respondent. 13 14 15 16 17 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas 18 corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On September 1, 2015, the Court ordered Respondent 19 to respond to the petition, and to submit “any and all transcripts or other documents 20 necessary for the resolution of the issues presented in the Petition.” See Rule 5, Rules 21 Governing Section 2254 Cases. On October 30, 2015, Respondent filed an answer, and 22 also lodged a number of state court documents. (ECF Nos. 16, 17.) 23 Petitioner’s first claim involves a challenge to a videotaped interview Petitioner 24 gave to police. (ECF No. 1.) The video interview was part of the state court record and 25 was discussed at some length in the last reasoned decision of the state court, issued by 26 the Fifth District Court of Appeal. However, it appears that the video was not lodged in 27 this Court. 28 1 2 Accordingly, Respondent is HEREBY ORDERED to lodge, within thirty days, a copy of the video at issue in the first claim in the petition. 3 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 13, 2017 /s/ 6 Michael J. Seng UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?