De Vivo v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 38

ORDER GRANTING the parties' request for an extension of time to 8/31/2018 for the filing joint or separate supplemental submissions regarding the calculation of attorney fees, and specifically addressing the total amount of past-due benefits awarded to plaintiff. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 8/20/2018. (Rooney, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 MAX M. DE VIVO, 10 Plaintiff, 11 12 13 v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Case No. 1:15-cv-01332-EPG ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING (ECF No. 37) Defendant. 14 15 16 17 The Court has before it the Joint Stipulation to Modify Supplemental Briefing Deadline (ECF No. 37). On July 19, 2018, the Court held a hearing on Plaintiff’s motion for attorney fees (ECF No. 18 29, 36). After hearing the parties’ arguments, the Court directed the parties to file, by the close 19 of business on August 17, 2018, a joint or separate supplemental submission regarding the 20 calculation of attorney fees (ECF No. 36). 21 The parties request a short extension of time in which to file their supplemental 22 submission(s). Based on the representations of counsel, the Court finds good cause for and will 23 accordingly grant the extension of time. 24 IT IS ORDERED that the extension of time (ECF No. 37) is GRANTED. 25 \\\ 26 \\\ 27 \\\ 28 \\\ 1 The parties shall file, by the close of business on August 31, 2018, a joint or separate 2 supplemental submission regarding the calculation of attorney fees, and specifically addressing 3 the total amount of past-due benefits awarded to Plaintiff. 4 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 20, 2018 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?