Hopson v. Smiley et al
Filing
19
STIPULATED DISMISSAL; ORDER Thereon, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 1/25/2016. CASE CLOSED.(Fahrney, E)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
FRESNO DIVISION
4
5
CYNTHIA HOPSON,
Case No.: 1:15-cv-01333-SKO
6
PLAINTIFF,
7
8
v.
9 DARREL SMILEY, as an individual and doing
business as “Smiley’s Shell Service,” RENA
10 RUDDELL, as an individual and in her
capacity as representative for the Rena Ruddell
11
Separate Property Trust, and DOES 1-10,
12 inclusive,
13
STIPULATED DISMISSAL; ORDER
THEREON
[Fed. R. Civ. P. 41]
DEFENDANTS.
14
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties in this action through their
15
designated counsel, that this action be and is hereby dismissed in its entirety, WITH PREJUDICE,
16
pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1). The parties shall bear their own costs and
17
attorney fee’s in connection with the lawsuit and the negotiation and preparation of any agreement
18
entered into by such parties.
19
20
Date: January 25th, 2016
/s/Daniel Malakauskas
By: Daniel Malakauskas,
Attorney for Plaintiff
Dated: January 25th 2016
/s/Christina Tillman______
By: Christina Tillman, of,
McCormick Barstow LLP
Attorneys for Defendants
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulated Dismissal; Order Thereon
1
ORDER
1
2
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties for dismissal of this case with prejudice in
3
accordance with Rule 41(a)(1)(ii), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be closed, and that
4
the parties shall bear their own costs and attorney’s fees in connection with the lawsuit and the
5
negotiation and preparation of any agreement entered into by such parties.
6
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
January 25, 2016
9
/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulated Dismissal; Order Thereon
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?