Hopson v. Smiley et al

Filing 19

STIPULATED DISMISSAL; ORDER Thereon, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 1/25/2016. CASE CLOSED.(Fahrney, E)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 FRESNO DIVISION 4 5 CYNTHIA HOPSON, Case No.: 1:15-cv-01333-SKO 6 PLAINTIFF, 7 8 v. 9 DARREL SMILEY, as an individual and doing business as “Smiley’s Shell Service,” RENA 10 RUDDELL, as an individual and in her capacity as representative for the Rena Ruddell 11 Separate Property Trust, and DOES 1-10, 12 inclusive, 13 STIPULATED DISMISSAL; ORDER THEREON [Fed. R. Civ. P. 41] DEFENDANTS. 14 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties in this action through their 15 designated counsel, that this action be and is hereby dismissed in its entirety, WITH PREJUDICE, 16 pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1). The parties shall bear their own costs and 17 attorney fee’s in connection with the lawsuit and the negotiation and preparation of any agreement 18 entered into by such parties. 19 20 Date: January 25th, 2016 /s/Daniel Malakauskas By: Daniel Malakauskas, Attorney for Plaintiff Dated: January 25th 2016 /s/Christina Tillman______ By: Christina Tillman, of, McCormick Barstow LLP Attorneys for Defendants 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulated Dismissal; Order Thereon 1 ORDER 1 2 Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties for dismissal of this case with prejudice in 3 accordance with Rule 41(a)(1)(ii), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be closed, and that 4 the parties shall bear their own costs and attorney’s fees in connection with the lawsuit and the 5 negotiation and preparation of any agreement entered into by such parties. 6 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 25, 2016 9 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulated Dismissal; Order Thereon 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?