Villery v. Jones et al

Filing 93

ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's 91 Motion for Extension of Time; ORDER GRANTING 92 Motion for an Informal Telephonic Conference, signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 7/29/2020. ( Case Management Deadline: 9/21/2020;Telephonic Status Conference set for August 21, 2020 at 10:00 a.m.) (Martin-Gill, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 JARED M. VILLERY, 10 Plaintiff, 11 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION v. 12 Case No. 1:15-cv-01360-DAD-JDP J. JONES, et al. ECF No. 91 13 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR AN INFORMAL TELEPHONIC CONFERENCE Defendants. 14 ECF No. 92 15 HEARING SET FOR AUGUST 21, 2020, AT 10:00 A.M. 16 17 18 19 20 21 Plaintiff’s request for an extension of time, ECF No. 91, is granted. He shall have up to and including September 21, 2020, to file a motion for partial summary judgment. Plaintiff’s request for an informal telephonic status conference, ECF No. 92, is also 22 granted. While the court is highly reluctant to reopen discovery, the court will hear from the 23 parties on the several matters plaintiff identifies in his motion. The court therefore sets an 24 informal telephonic status conference for August 21, 2020, at 10:00 a.m. The parties shall use 25 the dial-in 888-204-5984 and the passcode 4446176. Defense counsel shall make 26 arrangements with plaintiff’s institution of confinement for his attendance. No later than one 27 week before the conference, defendants shall also submit a statement of no more than five 28 pages on the issues plaintiff identifies and any others that should be discussed. Because some 1 1 defendants are separately represented, they may submit joint or separate statements as needed. 2 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 Dated: July 29, 2020 5 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 No. 205. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?