McGowan et al v. County of Kern et al

Filing 69

ORDER on JOINT STIPULATION for Continuances of Certain Scheduled Dates. The Court GRANTS IN PART the stipulation and MODIFIES the Scheduling Order (Doc. 49) as follows: Fact Discovery Cutoff RESET to 2/3/2017. Motion to Amend RESET to 2/17/ 2017. Expert Disclosures RESET to 2/24/2017. Rebuttal Expert Disclosures RESET to 3/10/2017. Expert Discovery Cutoff RESET to 3/31/2017. Non-Dispositive Motion Filing RESET to 4/4/2017. This modification does not change any other existing scheduling deadlines, including the Pretrial Conference and Trial dates, which remain on 7/17/2017, and 9/19/2017, respectively. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 11/21/2016. (Timken, A)

1 THE LAW OFFICE OF THOMAS C. SEABAUGH
Thomas C. Seabaugh, Esq., SBN 272458 | [e-mail]
2
128 North Fair Oaks Avenue
3 Pasadena, California 91103
Telephone: [phone]
4
5 CHAIN COHN STILES
David K Cohn, Esq., SBN 68768 | [e-mail]
6
Neil K. Gehlawat, Esq., SBN 289388 | [e-mail]
7 1430 Truxtun Ave., Suite 100
Kern, CA 93301
8
Telephone: [phone]
9 Facsimile: [phone]
10

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13
14

MARK McGOWAN, et al.,

Case No. 1:15-cv-01365-DAD-SKO

Plaintiffs,

15
16

ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION
FOR CONTINUANCES OF
CERTAIN SCHEDULED DATES

vs.

17
18

COUNTY OF KERN, et al.,

19

(Doc. 67)
Defendants.

20
21
22
23
24

ORDER
Having reviewed the parties’ “Joint Stipulation for Continuances of Certain

25 Scheduled Dates” (Doc. 67), and good cause having been shown under Fed. R. Civ.
26 P. 16(b)(4), the Court GRANTS IN PART the stipulation and MODIFIES the
27 Scheduling Order (Doc. 49) as follows:
28 //
-1-

ORDER

1

Current Date

New Date

2 Fact Discovery Cutoff

January 2, 2017

February 3, 2017

3 Motion to Amend

January 14, 2017

February 17, 2017

4 Expert Disclosures

February 10, 2017

February 24, 20171

5 Rebuttal Expert Disclosures

March 3, 2017

March 10, 20172

6 Expert Discovery Cutoff

March 24, 2017

March 31, 20173

7 Non-Dispositive Mtn. Filing

March 29, 2017

April 4, 20174

8 Non-Dispositive Mtn. Hearing May 10, 2017

same as current5

9 Dispositive Mtn. Filing

April 4, 2017

same as current6

10 Dispositive Mtn. Hearing

May 16, 2017

same as current7

11 //
12
13
1

The parties proposed March 10, 2017, as the deadline for initial expert disclosures. To allow

14 the parties adequate time to designate experts, conduct discovery, and file their dispositive and
15 non-dispositive motions, and to allow the Court adequate time to rule on those motions in advance
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

of the Pretrial Conference, the proposed date has been advanced.
2
The parties proposed April 3, 2017, as the deadline for “Suppl.” (rebuttal) expert disclosures.
To allow the parties adequate time to designate experts, conduct discovery, and file their
dispositive and non-dispositive motions, and to allow the Court adequate time to rule on those
motions in advance of the Pretrial Conference, the proposed date has been advanced.
3
The parties proposed April 24, 2017, as the deadline for expert discovery. To allow the
parties adequate time to conduct discovery and file their dispositive and non-dispositive motions,
and to allow the Court adequate time to rule on those motions in advance of the Pretrial
Conference, the proposed date has been advanced.
4
The parties proposed May 1, 2017, as the deadline for filing non-dispositive motions. To
allow the Court adequate time to rule on those motions in advance of the Pretrial Conference, the
proposed date has been advanced.
5
The parties proposed June 9, 2017, as the deadline for hearing non-dispositive motions. To
allow the Court adequate time to rule on those motions in advance of the Pretrial Conference, the
proposed date has been advanced and remains as currently set.
6
The parties proposed May 8, 2017, as the deadline for filing dispositive motions. To allow
the Court adequate time to rule on those motions in advance of the Pretrial Conference, the
proposed date has been advanced and remains as currently set.
7
The parties proposed June 16, 2017, as the deadline for hearing dispositive motions. To
allow the Court adequate time to rule on those motions in advance of the Pretrial Conference, the
proposed date has been advanced and remains as currently set.

28
-2-

ORDER

1

This modification does not change any other existing scheduling deadlines,

2 including the Pretrial Conference and Trial dates, which remain on July 17, 2017,
3 and September 19, 2017, respectively.
4
5 IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
Dated: November 21, 2016
7

/s/

Sheila K. Oberto

.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-

ORDER