Arciga v. Frauenheim

Filing 34

ORDER Directing Respondent to Lodge Further Documents, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/24/18. Twenty-Eight Day Deadline. (Gonzalez, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

MARIO ARCIGA,

12
13
14

No. 1:15-cv-01372-DAD-JLT

Petitioner,
v.

ORDER DIRECTING RESPONDENT TO
LODGE FURTHER DOCUMENTS

SCOTT FRAUENHEIM,

15

Respondent.

16
17

Petitioner is proceeding pro se in this matter. Now pending before this court is a petition

18

for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The Augmented Reporter’s Transcript

19

on Appeal that has been lodged with this court by respondent reflects the redaction of the

20

identities of certain jurors, either by using seat numbers or by using juror numbers. Pursuant to

21

Rules 5 and 7 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts,

22

Respondent is now ordered to lodge with this court the following documents:

23
24
25
26
27
28

(1) a copy of the Reporter’s Transcript which identifies the prospective jurors by their juror
numbers;
(2) a copy of the Reporter’s Transcript which does not redact the names of the prospective
jurors; and
(3) A copy of the state court’s master jury list including both the names of all jurors called
and their respective juror numbers. If such a document is not available, respondent shall
1

1

lodge unredacted pages 217 and 218 of the Clerk’s Transcript on Appeal, consisting of the

2

court’s minutes for April 9, 2012.

3

Respondent is directed to lodge any documents containing personal identifying

4

information of jurors in this matter under seal and not to file these documents on the court’s

5

docket. Respondent shall either lodge these documents or file a status report concerning the same

6

within twenty-eight (28) days of this order.

7

IT IS SO ORDERED.

8

Dated:

August 24, 2018
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2