Hosley v. Peery

Filing 5

ORDER of INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER from Sacramento (2:15-cv-1788) to Fresno (1:15-cv-1374) signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/4/15. (Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

DASHEME KAREME HOSLEY,

12

Petitioner,

13
14

No. 2:15-cv-1788 DAD P

v.

ORDER

SUZANNE M. PEERY, Warden,

15

Respondent.

16
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas

17
18

corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis. In his

19

application, petitioner challenges a judgment of conviction entered in the Stanislaus County

20

Superior Court. Stanislaus County is part of the Fresno Division of the United States District

21

Court for the Eastern District of California. See Local Rule 120(d).
Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in the proper

22
23

division of a court may, on the court’s own motion, be transferred to the proper division of the

24

court. Therefore, this action will be transferred to the Fresno Division of the court. This court

25

will not rule on petitioner’s request to proceed in forma pauperis.

26

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

27

1. This court has not ruled on petitioner’s request to proceed in forma pauperis;

28

/////
1

1
2
3
4

2. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
California sitting in Fresno; and
3. All future filings shall reference the new Fresno case number assigned and shall be
filed at:
United States District Court
Eastern District of California
2500 Tulare Street
Fresno, CA 93721

5
6
7

Dated: September 4, 2015

8
9
10
11
12
13

/kly
hosl1788.109

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2