Maria R., et al. v. William Nulick, et al.

Filing 33

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 8/29/2016 ORDERING that all parties are to serve their disclosure of Expert Witness(es) by the close of business 11/18/2016; all parties are to serve the disclosure of their Supplemental Expert Witness(es) by the close of business on 12/2/2016. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Brian S. Kabateck, SBN 152054 Christopher B. Noyes, SBN 270094 Benjamin S. Hakimfar, SBN 287457 KABATECK BROWN KELLNER LLP 644 South Figueroa Street Los Angeles, CA 90017 Telephone: (213) 217-5000 Facsimile: (213) 217-5010 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Dana Alden Fox, SBN 119761 Michael S. Moss, SBN 211115 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP 633 West 5th Street, Suite 4000 Los Angeles, CA 90071 Telephone: (213) 580-7923 Facsimile: (213) 250-7900 Attorneys for Defendants Tulare County Sheriff and County of Tulare Gary L. Logan, SBN 90558 LEBEAU-THELEN LLP 50001 E Commercenter Dr., Suite 300 Bakersfield, California 93309 Telephone: (661) 325-8962 Facsimile: (661) 325-1127 Attorneys for Defendant William Nulick 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 19 20 MARIA R., an individual; KARI R., an individual; VICKY P., an individual; NATASHA P., an individual; 21 22 CASE NO. 1:15-cv-01378 JAM EPG Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grojean STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE THE PRETRIAL EXPERT WITNESS DISCLOSURE DEADLINE Plaintiffs, vs. 23 24 25 26 27 WILLIAM NULICK, an individual; TULARE COUNTY SHERIFF, a California governmental entity; COUNTY OF TULARE, a California governmental entity; and DOES 1 to 50, inclusive, Defendants. Action Filed: September 9, 2015 Trial Date: March 20, 2017 28 4812-7001-3751.1 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs MARIA R., KARI R., VICKY P., and NATASHA P. (hereinafter “Plaintiffs”), and Defendants WILLIAM NULICK, COUNTY OF 3 4 TULARE and TUALRE COUNTY SHERIFF (“Defendants”), by and through their 5 undersigned attorneys, submitted their joint report on December 24, 2015, pursuant 6 to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f), and this Court’s Order of September 10, 2015. 7 8 WHEREAS, pursuant to this Court’s order of December 28, 2015, the parties 9 are to disclose their Expert Witness(es) on September 9, 2016 and for all parties to 10 11 disclose their Supplemental Expert Witness(es) on September 16, 2016; 12 WHEREAS, plaintiff, Maria Rangel’s deposition was timely noticed for 13 August 16, 2016 and was continued to September 9, 2016 at the request of counsel 14 15 16 17 for the plaintiffs in consideration of a scheduling conflict on the part of Maria Rangel; IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, pursuant to Local Rules 143 and 230(f), by 18 19 and between Plaintiffs and Defendants, through their respective attorneys of records, 20 that all parties are to serve their disclosure of Expert Witness(es) by the close of 21 business November 18, 2016 and are to serve the disclosure of their Supplemental 22 23 Expert Witness(es) by the close of business on December 2, 2016. 24 25 26 27 28 4812-7001-3751.1 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 DATED: August 26, 2016 2 KABATECK BROWN KELLNER LLP By: s/ Christopher B. Noyes Attorneys for Plaintiffs 3 4 5 DATED: August 26, 2016 6 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP By: s/ Michael S. Moss ________________ Dana Alden Fox Michael S. Moss Attorneys for Defendants Tulare County Sheriff and County of Tulare 7 8 9 10 11 DATED: August 26, 2016 12 LEBEAU-THELEN LLP By: s/ Gary L. bLogan___________________ Gary Logan Attorneys for Defendants William Nulick 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4812-7001-3751.1 3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 ORDER 2 3 Based upon the stipulation of the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, all 4 parties are to serve their disclosure of Expert Witness(es) by the close of business 5 November 18, 2016; all parties are to serve the disclosure of their Supplemental 6 Expert Witness(es) by the close of business on December 2, 2016. 7 8 Dated: 8/29/2016 /s/ John A. Mendez__________________ Judge of the United States District Court 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4812-7001-3751.1 4 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?