Maria R., et al. v. William Nulick, et al.

Filing 35

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 9/1/2016 ORDERING all discovery shall be completed by the close of business on 12/12/2016. (Jackson, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Brian S. Kabateck, SBN 152054 Christopher B. Noyes, SBN 270094 Benjamin S. Hakimfar, SBN 287457 KABATECK BROWN KELLNER LLP 644 South Figueroa Street Los Angeles, CA 90017 Telephone: (213) 217-5000 Facsimile: (213) 217-5010 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Dana Alden Fox, SBN 119761 Michael S. Moss, SBN 211115 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP 633 West 5th Street, Suite 4000 Los Angeles, CA 90071 Telephone: (213) 580-7923 Facsimile: (213) 250-7900 Attorneys for Defendants Tulare County Sheriff and County of Tulare Gary L. Logan, SBN 90558 LEBEAU-THELEN LLP 50001 E Commercenter Dr., Suite 300 Bakersfield, California 93309 Telephone: (661) 325-8962 Facsimile: (661) 325-1127 Attorneys for Defendant William Nulick 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 19 20 MARIA R., an individual; KARI R., an individual; VICKY P., an individual; NATASHA P., an individual; 21 22 Plaintiffs, vs. CASE NO. 1:15-cv-01378 – JAM -EPG Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grojean STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE THE DISCOVERY COMPLETION DEADLINE 23 24 25 26 27 WILLIAM NULICK, an individual; TULARE COUNTY SHERIFF, a California governmental entity; COUNTY OF TULARE, a California governmental entity; and DOES 1 to 50, inclusive, Defendants. Action Filed: September 9, 2015 Trial Date: March 20, 2017 28 -1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE THE DISCOVERY COMPLETION DEADLINE 1 2 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs MARIA R., KARI R., VICKY P., and NATASHA P. (hereinafter “Plaintiffs”), and Defendants WILLIAM NULICK, COUNTY OF 3 4 TULARE and TUALRE COUNTY SHERIFF (“Defendants”), by and through their 5 undersigned attorneys, submitted their joint report on December 24, 2015, pursuant 6 to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f), and this Court’s Order of September 10, 2015. 7 8 WHEREAS, pursuant to this Court’s order of December 28, 2015, all 9 discovery, including resolution of any discovery disputes, must be completed by 10 11 November 11, 2016; 12 WHEREAS, the parties are currently in the process of discovery and 13 discovery responses from Defendants COUNTY OF TULARE and TUALRE 14 15 COUNTY SHERIFF are not to be served until mid-October; 16 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, pursuant to Local Rules 143 and 230(f), by 17 and between Plaintiffs and Defendants, through their respective attorneys of records, 18 19 that the Discovery Completion Deadline be continued to December 12, 2016. 20 21 22 23 24 25 /// 26 27 /// 28 -2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE THE DISCOVERY COMPLETION DEADLINE 1 DATED: September 1, 2016 2 KABATECK BROWN KELLNER LLP By: s/ Christopher B. Noyes Attorneys for Plaintiffs 3 4 5 DATED: September 1, 2016 6 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP By: s/ Michael S. Moss ________________ Dana Alden Fox Michael S. Moss Attorneys for Defendants Tulare County Sheriff and County of Tulare 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 DATED: September 1, 2016 LEBEAU-THELEN LLP By: s/ Gary L. Logan___________________ Gary Logan Attorneys for Defendants William Nulick 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE THE DISCOVERY COMPLETION DEADLINE 1 ORDER 2 3 4 Based upon the stipulation of the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, all discovery shall be completed by the close of business on December 12, 2016. 5 6 7 Dated: 9/1/2016 /s/ John A. Mendez__________________ Judge of the United States District Court 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -4STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE THE DISCOVERY COMPLETION DEADLINE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?