Maria R., et al. v. William Nulick, et al.
Filing
35
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 9/1/2016 ORDERING all discovery shall be completed by the close of business on 12/12/2016. (Jackson, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Brian S. Kabateck, SBN 152054
Christopher B. Noyes, SBN 270094
Benjamin S. Hakimfar, SBN 287457
KABATECK BROWN KELLNER LLP
644 South Figueroa Street
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Telephone: (213) 217-5000
Facsimile: (213) 217-5010
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Dana Alden Fox, SBN 119761
Michael S. Moss, SBN 211115
LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP
633 West 5th Street, Suite 4000
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Telephone: (213) 580-7923
Facsimile: (213) 250-7900
Attorneys for Defendants Tulare County
Sheriff and County of Tulare
Gary L. Logan, SBN 90558
LEBEAU-THELEN LLP
50001 E Commercenter Dr., Suite 300
Bakersfield, California 93309
Telephone: (661) 325-8962
Facsimile: (661) 325-1127
Attorneys for Defendant William Nulick
16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
17
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
18
19
20
MARIA R., an individual; KARI R., an
individual; VICKY P., an individual;
NATASHA P., an individual;
21
22
Plaintiffs,
vs.
CASE NO. 1:15-cv-01378 – JAM -EPG
Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grojean
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
CONTINUE THE DISCOVERY
COMPLETION DEADLINE
23
24
25
26
27
WILLIAM NULICK, an individual;
TULARE COUNTY SHERIFF, a
California
governmental
entity;
COUNTY OF TULARE, a California
governmental entity; and DOES 1 to 50,
inclusive,
Defendants.
Action Filed: September 9, 2015
Trial Date: March 20, 2017
28
-1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE THE DISCOVERY COMPLETION DEADLINE
1
2
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs MARIA R., KARI R., VICKY P., and NATASHA P.
(hereinafter “Plaintiffs”), and Defendants WILLIAM NULICK, COUNTY OF
3
4
TULARE and TUALRE COUNTY SHERIFF (“Defendants”), by and through their
5
undersigned attorneys, submitted their joint report on December 24, 2015, pursuant
6
to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f), and this Court’s Order of September 10, 2015.
7
8
WHEREAS, pursuant to this Court’s order of December 28, 2015, all
9
discovery, including resolution of any discovery disputes, must be completed by
10
11
November 11, 2016;
12
WHEREAS, the parties are currently in the process of discovery and
13
discovery responses from Defendants COUNTY OF TULARE and TUALRE
14
15
COUNTY SHERIFF are not to be served until mid-October;
16
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, pursuant to Local Rules 143 and 230(f), by
17
and between Plaintiffs and Defendants, through their respective attorneys of records,
18
19
that the Discovery Completion Deadline be continued to December 12, 2016.
20
21
22
23
24
25
///
26
27
///
28
-2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE THE DISCOVERY COMPLETION DEADLINE
1
DATED: September 1, 2016
2
KABATECK BROWN KELLNER LLP
By: s/ Christopher B. Noyes
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
3
4
5
DATED: September 1, 2016
6
LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP
By: s/ Michael S. Moss ________________
Dana Alden Fox
Michael S. Moss
Attorneys for Defendants Tulare County
Sheriff and County of Tulare
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
DATED: September 1, 2016
LEBEAU-THELEN LLP
By: s/ Gary L. Logan___________________
Gary Logan
Attorneys for Defendants William Nulick
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE THE DISCOVERY COMPLETION DEADLINE
1
ORDER
2
3
4
Based upon the stipulation of the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, all
discovery shall be completed by the close of business on December 12, 2016.
5
6
7
Dated: 9/1/2016
/s/ John A. Mendez__________________
Judge of the United States District Court
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE THE DISCOVERY COMPLETION DEADLINE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?