Maria R., et al. v. William Nulick, et al.

Filing 75

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 3/31/17 ORDERING that Plaintiff's above-styled action, Maria R. et al. v. Nulick, et al, Case No. 1:15-cv-01378-JAM-EPG, is accordingly DISMISSED with prejudice. Each party shall be responsible for their own costs and expenses. CASE CLOSED (Becknal, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6

Brian S. Kabateck (SBN 152054)
[e-mail]
Douglas A. Rochen (SBN 217231)
[e-mail]
KABATECK BROWN KELLNER LLP
644 South Figueroa Street
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Tel: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff

10

Michael Steven Moss (SBN 211115)
[e-mail]
Dana Alden Fox, (SBN 119761)
[e-mail]
LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH, LLP
633 West 5th Street , Suite 4000
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Telephone No.: [phone]

11

Attorneys for Defendants County of Tulare and Tulare County Sheriff

12

Gary Logan (SBN 90558)
[e-mail]
LEBEAU-THELEN, LLP
5001 E Commercenter Dr, Ste 300
Bakersfield, CA 93309
Telephone No.: [phone]

7
8
9

13
14
15
16

Attorneys for Defendant William Nulick
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

17

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

18

20

MARIA R., an individual; KARI R., an
individual; VICKY P., an individual;
NATASHA P., an individual;

CASE NO. 1:15-cv-01378---JAM(EPG)
Honorable John A. Mendez
Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean

21

Plaintiffs,

22

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE:
VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF ACTION
WITH PREJUDICE

vs.

19

23
24
25
26
27
28

WILLIAM NULICK, an individual;
TULARE COUNTY SHERIFF, a
California governmental entity;
COUNTY OF TULARE, a California
governmental entity; and DOES 1 to 50,
inclusive,

Action Filed:
Trial Date:

September 9, 2015
March 20, 2017

Defendants.
-1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF ACTION

1
2

TO THE COURT AND ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties to the

3

above-identified action, through their respective counsel, hereby agree and stipulate to the

4

dismissal of the entire action, with prejudice, and with each party to bear their own costs. The

5

parties have reached a settlement on all claims.

6
7

DATED: March 31, 2017

KABATECK BROWN KELLNER, LLP

8
By: _____________________________
Douglas A. Rochen
Attorney for Plaintiffs
644 S. Figueroa Street
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Telephone: [phone]

9
10
11
12
13

DATED: March 31, 2017

LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH,
LLP

14
By: _____________________________
Michael Moss
Attorneys for Defendants County of Tulare
and Tulare County Sheriff
633 West 5th Street, Suite 4000
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Telephone No.: [phone]

15
16
17
18
19
20

DATED: March 31, 2017

LEBEAU-THELEN, LLP

21

By: _____________________________
Gary Logan
Attorneys for Defendant William Nulick
5001 E Commercenter Dr, Ste 300
Bakersfield, CA 93309
Telephone No.: [phone]

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF ACTION

1
2
3
4
5
6

Brian S. Kabateck (SBN 152054)
[e-mail]
Douglas A. Rochen (SBN 217231)
[e-mail]
KABATECK BROWN KELLNER LLP
644 South Figueroa Street
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Tel: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

10

Michael Steven Moss (SBN 211115)
[e-mail]
Dana Alden Fox, (SBN 119761)
[e-mail]
LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH, LLP
633 West 5th Street , Suite 4000
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Telephone No.: [phone]

11

Attorneys for Defendants County of Tulare and Tulare County Sheriff

12

Gary Logan (SBN 90558)
[e-mail]
LEBEAU-THELEN, LLP
5001 E Commercenter Dr, Ste 300
Bakersfield, CA 93309
Telephone No.: [phone]

7
8
9

13
14
15
16

Attorneys for Defendant William Nulick
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

17

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

18

20

MARIA R., an individual; KARI R., an
individual; VICKY P., an individual;
NATASHA P., an individual;

CASE NO. 1:15-cv-01378---JAM(EPG)
Honorable John A. Mendez
Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean

21

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE: VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL
OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

22

vs.

Action Filed:
Trial Date:

19

23
24
25
26
27
28

September 9, 2015
March 20, 2017

WILLIAM NULICK, an individual;
TULARE COUNTY SHERIFF, a
California governmental entity;
COUNTY OF TULARE, a California
governmental entity; and DOES 1 to 50,
inclusive,
Defendants.
-1[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF ACTION

1
2
3

TO THE COURT AND ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
Pursuant to Rule 41(A)(1)(ii), Plaintiffs MARIA R., an individual; KARI R., an individual;
VICKY P., an individual; NATASHA P., (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendants County of Tulare, Tulare

4
County Sheriff and William Nulick (“Defendants”) filed a Stipulation for Voluntary Dismissal of
5
6

the above-styled action, with each party to bear their own costs and expenses.

7

Plaintiff’s above-styled action, Maria R. et al. v. Nulick, et al, Case No. 1:15-cv-01378---

8

JAM(EPG), is accordingly dismissed with prejudice. Each party shall be responsible for their own

9

costs and expenses.

10
11

IT IS SO ORDERED.

12
13

Dated: 3/31/2017

/s/ John A. Mendez____________
United States District Court Judge

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-2[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF ACTION