Nelson v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation

Filing 6

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why Action Should Not Be Dismissed for Failure to Follow Court Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 11/17/15: Thirty-Day Response Deadline. (Hellings, J)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

CHAZ NELSON,

12

Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

CDCR,

15

Case No. 1:15-cv-01393 DLB PC
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR
FAILURE TO FOLLOW COURT ORDER
THIRTY-DAY RESPONSE DEADLINE

Defendant.

16
17

Plaintiff Chaz Nelson (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner in the custody of the California

18

Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this civil rights

19

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.1 He filed this action on September 14, 2015.
On September 16, 2015, the Court ordered Plaintiff to either pay the filing fee, or submit an

20
21

application to proceed in forma pauperis, within forty-five (45) days. Although Plaintiff filed an

22

application on September 14, 2015, he did not submit the correct application. Over forty-five (45)

23

days have passed and Plaintiff has failed to comply with the order.
Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, if any he has, why he failed to

24
25

comply with the Court’s September 16, 2015, order. Plaintiff must file a response to this order

26

///

27
28

1

Plaintiff has been ordered twice to submit a consent or decline form. The most recent order, issued on November 4,
2015, gives him thirty days to do so.

1

1

within thirty (30) days of the date of service. Plaintiff may also comply with this order by paying the

2

filing fee, or submitting an application to proceed in forma pauperis.

3

Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of this action.

4
5
6
7
8

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Dennis

November 17, 2015

L. Beck

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2