Villareal v. County of Fresno

Filing 103

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 86 , 98 , signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 5/2/2018: Defendant County of Fresno's motion to dismiss 86 is denied as moot. (Hellings, J)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ELAINE K. VILLAREAL,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15
16

No. 1:15-cv-01410-DAD-EPG

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS

v.
COUNTY OF FRESNO and SHERIFF
MARGARET MIMS,

(Doc. Nos. 86, 98)

Defendants.

17
18

Elaine Villareal (“plaintiff”) is a prisoner proceeding in forma pauperis and pro se in this

19

civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States

20

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

21

On March 20, 2018, the assigned magistrate judge entered findings and recommendations,

22

recommending that defendant County of Fresno’s motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 86) be denied as

23

moot in light of plaintiff’s filing of an amended complaint. (Doc. No. 98.) The parties were

24

provided an opportunity to file objections to the findings and recommendations. The deadline for

25

filing objections has passed and no objections have been filed.

26

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this

27

court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the

28

court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis.
1

1

Accordingly:

2

1. The findings and recommendations issued by the magistrate judge on March 20, 2018,

3
4
5
6

(Doc. No. 98) are adopted in full; and
2. Defendant County of Fresno’s motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 86) is denied as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

May 2, 2018
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2