Villareal v. County of Fresno
Filing
15
Notice and Warning of Requirements for Opposing Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Exhaust/ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 2/1/17. (Martin-Gill, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
ELAINE K. VILLAREAL,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
15
v.
COUNTY OF FRESNO,
1:15-cv-01410-EPG (PC)
NOTICE AND WARNING OF
REQUIREMENTS FOR OPPOSING
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR
FAILURE TO EXHAUST
(ECF No. 12)
Defendant.
16
17
Elaine K. Villareal (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in
18
this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 31, 2017, Defendant filed a
19
motion to dismiss this case under Rule 12(b)(6), for failure to exhaust administrative remedies.
20
(ECF No. 12).
21
Defendant has not provided Plaintiff with the requisite Notice and Warning, pursuant to
22
the Ninth Circuit’s requirement in Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934 (9th Cir. 2012), informing
23
Plaintiff of her rights and responsibilities in opposing Defendant’s motion to dismiss for failure
24
to exhaust. Therefore, the Court shall, by this order, provide Plaintiff with the requisite Notice
25
and Warning. Defendant is advised that in the future it should routinely provide a Notice and
26
Warning to a pro se plaintiff in a prisoner case when bringing a motion to dismiss or motion for
27
summary judgment based on failure to exhaust administrative remedies before filing suit.
28
Woods 684 F.3d at 940 (Counsel for defendants in prisoner civil rights cases should include in
1
1
any motion to dismiss or a motion for summary judgment in a case where the plaintiff is not
2
assisted by counsel a short and plain statement of the requirements needed to defeat a
3
defendant's dispositive motion).
4
5
NOTICE AND WARNING OF REQUIREMENTS FOR OPPOSING
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO EXHAUST
6
Pursuant to Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934 (9th Cir. 2012), the Court now hereby
7
notifies Plaintiff of the following rights and requirements for opposing Defendant’s motion to
8
dismiss for failure to exhaust. Woods, 684 F.3d 934 (Fair notice of the requirements needed to
9
defeat a defendant’s motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust administrative remedies must be
10
11
provided to a pro se prisoner litigant in a civil rights case).
NOTICE AND WARNING:
12
Defendant has filed a motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust
13
administrative remedies as to one or more claims in the complaint. The
14
failure to exhaust administrative remedies is subject to a motion for
15
summary judgment or, if a failure to exhaust is clear on the face of the
16
complaint, a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6). Albino v. Baca, 747
17
F.3d 1162, 1166 (9th Cir. 2014). “The motion to dismiss for failure to
18
exhaust administrative remedies is similar to a motion for a summary
19
judgment in that the district court will consider materials beyond the
20
pleadings; the plaintiff has a ‘right to file counter-affidavits or other
21
responsive evidentiary materials.’” Stratton v. Buck, 697 F.3d 1004, 1008
22
(9th Cir. 2012), quoting Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 960 (9th Cir. 1998).
23
If the Court determines that all of the claims are unexhausted, the
24
case will be dismissed, which means Plaintiff=s case is over. If some of the
25
claims are exhausted and some are unexhausted, the unexhausted claims
26
will be dismissed and the case will proceed forward only on the exhausted
27
claims. Jones v. Bock, 549 U.S. 199, 219-224, 127 S. Ct. 910, 923-26 (2007).
28
A dismissal for failure to exhaust is without prejudice. Id.
2
1
Unless otherwise ordered, all motions to dismiss shall be briefed
2
pursuant to Local Rule 230(l). Plaintiff is required to file an opposition or a
3
statement of non-opposition to Defendants’ motion to dismiss. Local Rule
4
230(l).
5
opposition to the motion, this action may be dismissed, with prejudice, for
6
failure to prosecute. The opposition or statement of non-opposition must be
7
filed not more than 21 days after the date of service of the motion. Id.
If Plaintiff fails to file an opposition or a statement of non-
8
If responding to Defendant’s motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust
9
administrative remedies, Plaintiff may not simply rely on allegations in the
10
complaint.
11
specific facts in declaration(s) and/or by submitting other evidence
12
regarding the exhaustion of administrative remedies. See Fed. R. Civ. P.
13
43(c). Unsigned declarations will be stricken, and declarations not signed
14
under penalty of perjury have no evidentiary value. If Plaintiff does not
15
submit her own evidence in opposition, the Court may conclude that
16
Plaintiff has not exhausted the administrative remedies and the case will be
17
dismissed in whole or in part.
Instead, Plaintiff must oppose the motion by setting forth
18
19
20
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
February 1, 2017
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?