Villareal v. County of Fresno

Filing 15

Notice and Warning of Requirements for Opposing Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Exhaust/ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 2/1/17. (Martin-Gill, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 ELAINE K. VILLAREAL, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 v. COUNTY OF FRESNO, 1:15-cv-01410-EPG (PC) NOTICE AND WARNING OF REQUIREMENTS FOR OPPOSING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO EXHAUST (ECF No. 12) Defendant. 16 17 Elaine K. Villareal (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in 18 this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 31, 2017, Defendant filed a 19 motion to dismiss this case under Rule 12(b)(6), for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. 20 (ECF No. 12). 21 Defendant has not provided Plaintiff with the requisite Notice and Warning, pursuant to 22 the Ninth Circuit’s requirement in Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934 (9th Cir. 2012), informing 23 Plaintiff of her rights and responsibilities in opposing Defendant’s motion to dismiss for failure 24 to exhaust. Therefore, the Court shall, by this order, provide Plaintiff with the requisite Notice 25 and Warning. Defendant is advised that in the future it should routinely provide a Notice and 26 Warning to a pro se plaintiff in a prisoner case when bringing a motion to dismiss or motion for 27 summary judgment based on failure to exhaust administrative remedies before filing suit. 28 Woods 684 F.3d at 940 (Counsel for defendants in prisoner civil rights cases should include in 1 1 any motion to dismiss or a motion for summary judgment in a case where the plaintiff is not 2 assisted by counsel a short and plain statement of the requirements needed to defeat a 3 defendant's dispositive motion). 4 5 NOTICE AND WARNING OF REQUIREMENTS FOR OPPOSING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO EXHAUST 6 Pursuant to Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934 (9th Cir. 2012), the Court now hereby 7 notifies Plaintiff of the following rights and requirements for opposing Defendant’s motion to 8 dismiss for failure to exhaust. Woods, 684 F.3d 934 (Fair notice of the requirements needed to 9 defeat a defendant’s motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust administrative remedies must be 10 11 provided to a pro se prisoner litigant in a civil rights case). NOTICE AND WARNING: 12 Defendant has filed a motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust 13 administrative remedies as to one or more claims in the complaint. The 14 failure to exhaust administrative remedies is subject to a motion for 15 summary judgment or, if a failure to exhaust is clear on the face of the 16 complaint, a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6). Albino v. Baca, 747 17 F.3d 1162, 1166 (9th Cir. 2014). “The motion to dismiss for failure to 18 exhaust administrative remedies is similar to a motion for a summary 19 judgment in that the district court will consider materials beyond the 20 pleadings; the plaintiff has a ‘right to file counter-affidavits or other 21 responsive evidentiary materials.’” Stratton v. Buck, 697 F.3d 1004, 1008 22 (9th Cir. 2012), quoting Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 960 (9th Cir. 1998). 23 If the Court determines that all of the claims are unexhausted, the 24 case will be dismissed, which means Plaintiff=s case is over. If some of the 25 claims are exhausted and some are unexhausted, the unexhausted claims 26 will be dismissed and the case will proceed forward only on the exhausted 27 claims. Jones v. Bock, 549 U.S. 199, 219-224, 127 S. Ct. 910, 923-26 (2007). 28 A dismissal for failure to exhaust is without prejudice. Id. 2 1 Unless otherwise ordered, all motions to dismiss shall be briefed 2 pursuant to Local Rule 230(l). Plaintiff is required to file an opposition or a 3 statement of non-opposition to Defendants’ motion to dismiss. Local Rule 4 230(l). 5 opposition to the motion, this action may be dismissed, with prejudice, for 6 failure to prosecute. The opposition or statement of non-opposition must be 7 filed not more than 21 days after the date of service of the motion. Id. If Plaintiff fails to file an opposition or a statement of non- 8 If responding to Defendant’s motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust 9 administrative remedies, Plaintiff may not simply rely on allegations in the 10 complaint. 11 specific facts in declaration(s) and/or by submitting other evidence 12 regarding the exhaustion of administrative remedies. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 13 43(c). Unsigned declarations will be stricken, and declarations not signed 14 under penalty of perjury have no evidentiary value. If Plaintiff does not 15 submit her own evidence in opposition, the Court may conclude that 16 Plaintiff has not exhausted the administrative remedies and the case will be 17 dismissed in whole or in part. Instead, Plaintiff must oppose the motion by setting forth 18 19 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 1, 2017 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?