Villareal v. County of Fresno
Filing
159
ORDER DENYING 158 Third Stipulation for Extension of Time of Discovery Cutoff and Related Dates signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 2/25/2020. (Jessen, A)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
ELAINE K. VILLAREAL,
Case No. 1:15-cv-01410-DAD-EPG (PC)
8
Plaintiff,
v.
9
10
COUNTY OF FRESNO and MARGARET
MIMS,
11
Defendants.
ORDER DENYING THIRD
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF
TIME OF DISCOVERY CUTOFF AND
RELATED DATES
(ECF No. 158)
12
13
On November 6, 2019, the parties filed a second stipulation for an extension of time of the
14
discovery cutoff and related dates. (ECF No. 155). The Court modified the schedule as requested
15
by the parties. (ECF No. 156). The Court also warned the parties that, as “this [was] the second
16
stipulation for an extension of the discovery deadlines, and that discovery has already been open for
17
over a year, no further extensions of the discovery deadlines will be granted.” (Id. at 2).
On February 22, 2020, the parties filed a third stipulation for an extension of time of the
18
19
discovery cutoff and related dates. (ECF No. 158). The stipulation does not address the Court’s
20
prior warning, and the Court will not extend the discovery deadlines further. Moreover, the
21
proposed amended dates do not leave enough time between the dispositive motion filing deadline,
22
which the parties propose to extend to October 1, 2020, and the trial, which is set for March 16,
23
2021.
24
25
26
27
For these reasons, the parties’ request for extension of time is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
February 25, 2020
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?