Villareal v. County of Fresno

Filing 250

ORDER Requiring Plaintiff's Counsel to Inform the Court Whether a Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum is Necessary to Secure Plaintiff's Attendance at Trial, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 09/29/2022. Seven-Day Deadline. (Maldonado, C)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
ELAINE K. VILLAREAL,
12
13
v.
14
15

COUNTY OF FRESNO,

16

Case No. 1:15-cv-01410-ADA-EPG (PC)
Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF’S
COUNSEL TO INFORM THE COURT
WHETHER A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
AD TESTIFICANDUM IS NECESSARY TO
SECURE PLAINTIFF’S ATTENDANCE AT
TRIAL
Defendant. SEVEN-DAY DEADLINE

17
Plaintiff Elaine K. Villareal is proceeding in forma pauperis in this civil rights action

18
19

brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Based on the record in this case, it is unclear if Plaintiff

20

Elaine Villareal is currently incarcerated. Thus, it is unclear if the Court must issue a writ of

21

habeas corpus ad testificandum to secure Plaintiff’s attendance at the trial, which is currently set

22

for November 8, 2022.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s counsel has seven days from the date of

23
24

service of this order to file a notice informing the Court whether a writ of habeas corpus ad

25

testificandum is necessary to secure Plaintiff’s attendance at the trial.

26

\\\

27

\\\

28

\\\
1

1

If a writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum is necessary, Plaintiff’s counsel shall further

2

inform the Court where Plaintiff is currently incarcerated and provide the Court with the relevant

3

identification number(s).

4
5
6

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

September 29, 2022

/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2