Rodriguez, et al. v. City of Fresno, et al.
Filing
27
ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 9/18/17, ORDERING that Plaintiff's Pre-Trial Conference Statement shall be deemed timely filed. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
Stanley S. Ma, #188539
Attorney at Law
2224 N. Fine Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, California 93727
Telephone:
(559) 490-1313
Facsimile:
(559) 490-7555
Attorneys for Plaintiff:
6
7
TINA MA, an individual and successor in
Interest of JOSEPH MA
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COIURT
10
11
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
-oOo-
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
TINA MA, an individual and successor in
Interest of JOSEPH MA,
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
)
vs.
)
)
CITY OF FRESNO; CHIEF OF POLICE
)
JERRY DYER; in his individual and official
)
capacities; and Does 2-50, inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
__________________________________________)
Case No. 1:15-cv-01426 WBS-MJS
PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST TO
ALLOW LATE PRE-TRIAL
CONFERENCE STATEMENT
FILING ; ORDER
Comes the Plaintiff, TINA MA, by counsel, STANLEY S. MA, Attorney at
LAW, and moves the Court to accept the late filing of Plaintiff’s Pre-Trial
Conference Statement. As grounds for its motion, Plaintiff’s counsel submits
that he was made aware the Pre-Trial Conference Statement requirement. As
such, the matter was placed on my personal calendar on my cellphone with a
back-up reminder at my reception office desk. That I am a solo practitioner
[Pleading Title] - 1
1
and manage my own calendar on my cell phone. That sometime after the matter
2
was placed in my calendar, I took my cell phone into the Apple store for a
3
screen repair. However, when I went to retrieve my phone, the store agent
4
informed me that all the information was lost and as such they provided me a
5
new phone.
6
calendar information contained in a separate 3rd party application was lost.
7
Immediately after learning of the loss of information, I made my best effort
8
to replicate my calendar. Even so, my calendar was not 100% replicated.
9
compound matters, several reminder notes for cases I had at my reception desk
That even though I backed-up most off my information, all of my
To
10
were lost or damaged during a break-in on August 15, 2017. On that occasion,
11
an intruder broke into my office only gaining access to my reception area and
12
was only able to take stationary, my notebook and other small office
13
supplies. A Police report documenting the break-n was made by me.
14
because of the two issues above, my calendar and notes were not available to
15
remind to file the Pre-Trial Conference Statement by September 11, 2017. That
16
after being emailed by the courtroom deputy regarding my statement, I began
17
working on the document immediately, and subsequently contacting opposing
18
counsel to address some issues required in my statement. That because of
19
several other matters and court appearances, the earliest I could complete
20
the document was by September 14, 2017.
21
my delay but was informed by him he would still be able to file a timely Pre-
22
Trial Conference Statement.
23
That
That I informed opposing counsel of
The late filing was not done for purposes of delay, and there is no
24
prejudice to the Defendants.
For these reasons, I respectfully request that
25
the Court accept the late filing of Plaintiff’s Pre-Trial Conference
26
Statement.
27
I certify that on September 14, 2017, I electronically filed the
28
foregoing with the Clerk of the Court by using the CM/ECF system, which will
[Pleading Title] - 2
1
send notice of electronic filing giving notice to opposing counsel of this
2
request to file a late Pre-Trial Conference Statement.
/S/ STANLEY S. MA
3
DATED: 9/14/17
4
_____________________________________
STANLEY S. MA, ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
Plaintiff’s Pre-Trial Conference Statement shall be deemed timely
9
filed.
10
Dated:
September 18, 2017
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[Pleading Title] - 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?