Hubbard v. George

Filing 14

ORDER DISREGARDING AS MOOT 12 MOTION TO EXPEDITE AND 10 MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 8/17/2016. (Lundstrom, T)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ZANE HUBBARD,
Petitioner,

12
13

v.

14

CHARLES PHILIP ARTHUR GEORGE,

15

Respondent.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 1:15-cv-01441-LJO-JLT
ORDER DISREGARDING AS MOOT
PETITIONER’S MOTION TO EXPEDITE (Doc. 12)
ORDER DISREGARDING AS MOOT
PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT
OF COUNSEL (Doc. 10)

16
17

The petition in this action alleged violations of the Maryland Toleration Act of 1649 and the

18

Coercive Acts of 1774, and naming, inter alia, Prince Charles and Queen Elizabeth II of Great Britain,

19

as well as Pope Francis, as respondents. (Doc. 1) On September 29, 2015, the Court issued Findings

20

and Recommendations to summarily dismiss the petition as frivolous. (Doc. 5). On November 19,

21

2015, the District Judge assigned to the case adopted those Findings and Recommendations and

22

dismissed the petition and entered judgment. (Docs. 8; 9) On November 30, 2015, Petitioner filed the

23

instant motions requesting appointment of counsel and expediting of the resolution of his claims.

24

(Docs. 10; 12)

25
26

In light of the Court’s order summarily dismissing the petition as frivolous before the petitioner
filed the instant motions, the motions will be disregarded as moot. Thus, the Court ORDERS:

27

1. Petitioner’s motion to expedite proceedings (Doc. 12) is DISREGARDED as MOOT.

28

2. Petitioner’s motion for appointment of counsel (Doc. 10) is DISREGARDED as MOOT.
1

1

No further filings will be accepted in this case.

2
3
4
5

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

August 17, 2016

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2