Harris v. German et al

Filing 114

ORDER for Plaintiff to Show Cause why this case should not be dismissed for his failure to file a Pretrial Statement, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 08/4/2022 (Show Cause Response due within 20-Day Deadline)(Martin-Gill, S)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

DEVONTE B. HARRIS,

9
10
11

Plaintiff,
vs.
GERMAN, et al.,

12

Defendants.

1:15-cv-01462-DAD-GSA-PC
ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO SHOW
CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT
BE DISMISSED FOR HIS FAILURE TO
FILE A PRETRIAL STATEMENT
TWENTY-DAY DEADLINE

13
14

On March 3, 2021, the Court issued a Second Scheduling Order scheduling a Telephonic

15

Trial Confirmation Hearing in this case for the date of September 26, 2022 at 1:30 p.m. in

16

Courtroom 5 before the Honorable Dale A. Drozd. (ECF No. 110.) Plaintiff was ordered to file

17

his pretrial statement on or before July 26, 2022. The deadline has passed and Plaintiff has not

18

filed a pretrial statement or otherwise responded to the Court’s order.

19

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

20

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within twenty days of the date of service

21

of this order, Plaintiff is ordered to file a response showing cause why this case should not be

22

dismissed for his failure to file a pretrial statement in compliance with the Court’s Second

23

Scheduling Order issued on March 3, 2021.

24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

August 4, 2022

/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE