Harris v. German et al
Filing
31
ORDER Adopting 30 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and DISMISSING Certain Claims and Defendants signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/17/2018. (Sant Agata, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DEVONTE B. HARRIS,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 1:15-cv-01462-DAD-GSA
v.
HUMBERTO GERMAN, et al.,
15
Defendants.
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING
CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS
(Doc. No. 30)
16
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights
17
18
action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge
19
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On December 21, 2017, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and
20
21
recommendations, recommending that claims and defendants be dismissed consistent with the
22
magistrate judge’s prior order in light of Williams v. King, 875 F.3d 500 (9th Cir. 2017). (Doc.
23
No. 30.) The parties were granted fourteen days in which to file objections to the findings and
24
recommendations. (Id.) The fourteen-day time period has expired, and no objections have been
25
filed.
26
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, the
27
undersigned has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire
28
/////
1
1
file, the undersigned concludes the findings and recommendations are supported by the record
2
and proper analysis.
3
4
Given the foregoing:
1.
5
6
The magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations issued on December 21, 2017
(Doc. No. 30) are adopted in full;
2.
Consistent with the magistrate judge’s prior screening order issued on September 11,
7
2017 (Doc. No. 21), the following claims and defendants are dismissed, for the
8
reasons provided in the screening order:
9
a.
Defendants C/O Summer Cordova, C/O L. Borgess, C/O R. Womack, C/O D.
10
Lovelady, C/O D. Menzie, C/O D. Botello, C/O S. Pano, C/O R. Leal,
11
Sergeant J. Martinez, Sergeant W. Rasley, and Sergeant J. Hubbard are
12
dismissed from this action for Plaintiff’s failure to state any claims under
13
§ 1983 against them upon which relief may be granted; and
14
b.
are dismissed from this action based on Plaintiff’s failure to state a claim; and
15
16
17
18
Plaintiff’s claims for failure to protect, false reports, and destruction of video
3.
This case is referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
January 17, 2018
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?