Harris v. German et al
Filing
99
ORDER SETTING Settlement Conference, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 8/11/2020. (Settlement Conference set for 10/15/2020 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 25 (KJN) before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman.) (Marrujo, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
DEVONTE B. HARRIS,
13
14
15
16
1:15-cv-01462-DAD-GSA-PC
Plaintiff,
vs.
ORDER SETTING SETTLEMENT
CONFERENCE
HUMBERTO GERMAN, et al.,
Defendants.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Devonte B. Harris (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis
24
with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The court has determined that this case
25
will benefit from a settlement conference. Therefore, this case will be referred to Magistrate
26
Judge Kendall J. Newman to conduct a settlement conference on October 15, 2020 at 1:30 p.m.
27
The settlement conference will be conducted by remote means, to be determined at a later date
28
and time. The Court will issue the necessary transportation order in due course.
1
1
2
In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
3
1. This case is set for a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Kendall J.
4
Newman on October 15, 2020 at 1:30 p.m. The settlement conference will be
5
conducted by remote means, to be determined at a later date and time.
6
2. A representative with full and unlimited authority to negotiate and enter into a binding
settlement on the defendants’ behalf shall attend in person.1
7
8
3. Those in attendance must be prepared to discuss the claims, defenses and damages.
9
The failure of any counsel, party or authorized person subject to this order to appear in
10
person may result in the imposition of sanctions. In addition, the conference will not
11
proceed and will be reset to another date.
12
4. The parties are directed to exchange non-confidential settlement statements seven days
13
prior to the settlement conference. These statements shall simultaneously be delivered
14
to the court using the following email address: kjnorders@caed.uscourts.gov. Plaintiff
15
shall mail his non-confidential settlement statement Attn: Magistrate Judge Kendall J.
16
Newman, USDC CAED, 501 I Street, Suite 4-200, Sacramento, CA 95814 so that it
17
arrives at least seven (7) days prior to the settlement conference. The envelope shall
18
be marked “SETTLEMENT STATEMENT.” The date and time of the settlement
19
conference shall be prominently indicated on the settlement statement. If a party
20
desires to share additional confidential information with the court, they may do so
21
pursuant to the provisions of Local Rule 270(d) and (e).
22
While the exercise of its authority is subject to abuse of discretion review, “the district court has the authority to
order parties, including the federal government, to participate in mandatory settlement conferences… .” United States
v. United States District Court for the Northern Mariana Islands, 694 F.3d 1051, 1053, 1057, 1059 (9th Cir.
2012)(“the district court has broad authority to compel participation in mandatory settlement conference[s].”). The
term “full authority to settle” means that the individuals attending the mediation conference must be authorized to
fully explore settlement options and to agree at that time to any settlement terms acceptable to the parties. G.
Heileman Brewing Co., Inc. v. Joseph Oat Corp., 871 F.2d 648, 653 (7th Cir. 1989), cited with approval in Official
Airline Guides, Inc. v. Goss, 6 F.3d 1385, 1396 (9th Cir. 1993). The individual with full authority to settle must also
have “unfettered discretion and authority” to change the settlement position of the party, if appropriate. Pitman v.
Brinker Int’l., Inc., 216 F.R.D. 481, 485-86 (D. Ariz. 2003), amended on recon. in part, Pitman v. Brinker Int’l., Inc.,
2003 WL 23353478 (D. Ariz. 2003). The purpose behind requiring the attendance of a person with full settlement
authority is that the parties’ view of the case may be altered during the face to face conference. Pitman, 216 F.R.D.
at 486. An authorization to settle for a limited dollar amount or sum certain can be found not to comply with the
requirement of full authority to settle. Nick v. Morgan’s Foods, Inc., 270 F.3d 590, 596-97 (8th Cir. 2001).
1
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
1
2
5. Judge Newman or another representative from the court will be contacting the parties
3
either by telephone or in person, approximately two weeks prior to the settlement
4
conference, to ascertain each party’s expectations of the settlement conference.
5
6. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on the Litigation Office
6
at California State Prison, Corcoran, via facsimile at (559) 992-7372.
7
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
August 11, 2020
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?