Velasquez v. Sherman
ORDER DENYING as MOOT 32 Motion to Proceed IFP on Appeal signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 3/29/2017. (Sant Agata, S)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ANDREW FRANCISCO VELASQUEZ,
Case No. 1:15-cv-01472-DAD-EPG-HC
ORDER DENYING AS MOOT MOTION TO
PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ON
(ECF No. 32)
Petitioner is a state prisoner who proceeded pro se with a petition for writ of habeas
15 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On February 24, 2017, the Court adopted the Magistrate
16 Judge’s findings and recommendation and denied the petition. (ECF No. 26).
On March 27, 2017, Petitioner filed the instant motion to proceed in forma pauperis on
18 appeal. (ECF No. 32). The Court previously permitted Petitioner to proceed in forma pauperis in
19 this action. (ECF No. 5). Therefore, Petitioner does not require further authorization to appeal in
20 forma pauperis. Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3).
Accordingly, Petitioner’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal (ECF No. 32) is
22 DENIED as MOOT.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
March 29, 2017
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?