Sandra Garybo et al v. Leonardo Bros et al

Filing 31

ORDER AFTER FIRST STATUS CONFERENCE, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 6/20/2016. (Hall, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

SANDRA GARYBO, et al.,
Plaintiffs,

12
13
14

v.
LEONARDO BROS., et al.,
Defendants.

15
16

) Case No.: 1:15-cv-01487 DAD JLT
)
) ORDER AFTER FIRST STATUS CONFERENCE
)
)
)
)
)

On June 20, 2016, the Court held the first status conference to learn about the progress of

17

discovery thus far. Golden West’s attorney, Ms. Shams, reported that she was in the process of

18

reviewing seven banker’s boxes of documents received from her client that were potentially responsive

19

to the plaintiffs’ discovery request. (Doc. 29 at 2; Doc. 30) She anticipated completing the review

20

within a week or two. Likewise, she was working with her clients on the production of responsive

21

electronic data. Counsel reported that they had not yet conferred about the format or content of the

22

output of electronic data as required by the scheduling order (Doc. 27 at 4). Likewise, they had not yet

23

finalized the protective order they wish to have issued. Thus, the Court sets the following deadlines and

24

ORDERS:

25
26
27
28

1.

No later than June 24, 2016, Golden West SHALL produce the draft protective order

to plaintiffs with proposed changes, if any;
2.

No later than July 1, 2016, the parties SHALL file the stipulated protective order. In

the event there remains disagreement over any terms of the protective order, the parties SHALL file the
1

1

proposed protective order which sets forth the terms on which they agree. They SHALL also set forth

2

their positions on the terms about which they disagree. The Court will then consider the parties’

3

positions and issue the protective order that, in its judgment, it determines is appropriate;

4

3.

No later than July 1, 2016, the relevant personnel from each side, including counsel if

5

they wish, SHALL confer to determine the content of the electronic production and the format of the

6

electronic production;

7
8
9
10
11

No later than July 8, 2016, Golden West SHALL make available to plaintiffs’ copy

4.

service, the paper documents responsive to the plaintiffs’ discovery request;
5.

No later than July 22, 2016, Golden West SHALL produce the electronic data

responsive to the plaintiffs’ discovery request;
6.

In the event that either side does not meet a deadline set forth here, that party SHALL

12

show cause in writing within five days of the missed deadline why they/it failed to comply with the

13

Court’s orders.

14
15
16
17

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

June 20, 2016

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2