Alba v. County of Tulare, California et al

Filing 16

STIPULATION and ORDER GRANTING the parties' request to continue the Initial Scheduling Conference currently set for 2/18/2016 and CONTINUING it to 4/28/2016 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (EPG) before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 2/9/2016. (Rooney, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 William A. Romaine, #126966 Law Office of William A. Romaine 206 West Lacey Blvd. #309 Hanford, CA 93230 Telephone: (559) 582-9360 Facsimile: (559) 582-9350 Attorney for Plaintiff 6 11 KATHLEEN BALES-LANGE, #094765 County Counsel for the County of Tulare Judith D. Chapman, #169479 Deputy County Counsel 2900 West Burrel, County Civic Center Visalia, California 93291 Telephone: (559) 733-6263 Facsimile: (559) 737-4319 12 Attorneys for Defendant County of Tulare 7 8 9 10 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – FRESNO 14 15 DENNIS ALBA, 16 Case Number: 1:15-cv-01492-EPG Plaintiffs, 17 18 vs. 19 COUNTY OF TULARE, CALIFORNIA, TULARE COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPUTY RONALD CROUCH, TULARE COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, TULARE COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPUTY SERGEANT TORRES, TULARE COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPUTY DERRICK HOOD AND TULARE COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPUTY BERTOLDO, 20 21 22 23 24 PARTIES’ JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE THE MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE HEARING DATE Date: February 18, 2016 Time: 9:00 a.m. Courtroom: 10 Erica P. Grojean U.S. Magistrate Judge 25 26 27 28 County Counsel Tulare County Visalia, California Defendants. JOINT STIPULATION Plaintiff, DENNIS ALBA by and through his attorney of record, William A. Romaine 1 PARTIES’ JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE MSC HEARING DATE 1 and Defendants, COUNTY OF TULARE, CALIFORNIA, TULARE COUNTY SHERIFF’S 2 DEPUTY RONALD CROUCH, TULARE COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, 3 TULARE COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPUTY SERGEANT TORRES, TULARE COUNTY 4 SHERIFF’S DEPUTY DERRICK HOOD AND TULARE COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPUTY 5 BERTOLDO, by and through Tulare County Counsel, Deputy County Counsel, Judith D. 6 Chapman, stipulate as follows: 7 WHEREAS the parties are required pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f), to meet and 8 confer at least twenty-one (21) days prior to the Mandatory Scheduling Conference which is 9 scheduled for February 18, 2016. Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss on February 1, 2016 10 and hearing on the Motion to Dismiss has been set for March 11, 2016 at 10:00 a.m. The 11 Plaintiff’s Opposition to the Motion Dismiss is due February 26, 2016 and Defendants’ 12 Reply to Opposition is due March 4, 2016. The parties agree that a Scheduling Conference 13 will be more productive and the parties will be able to discuss facts, issues and dates if the 14 Scheduling Conference is continued until after the hearing on the Motion to Dismiss. 15 THEREFORE the parties respectfully request that the Mandatory Scheduling 16 Conference currently scheduled for February 18, 2016 at 9:00 a.m. be continued for a period 17 of at least 45 days from the hearing on the Motion to Dismiss, or on or after April 26, 2016. 18 IT IS SO STIPULATED BY THE ATTORNEYS OF RECORD AND NAMED 19 HEREIN. 20 Dated: 2-9-2016 LAW OFFICE OF WILLIAM A. ROMAINE 21 ____/s/ William A. Romaine______ William A. Romaine, Attorney for Plaintiff 22 23 24 25 Dated: 2-9-2016 KATHLEEN BALES-LANGE County Counsel 26 _____/s/Judith D. Chapman___ 27 Judith D. Chapman, Attorney for Defendants 28 County Counsel Tulare County Visalia, California 2 PARTIES’ JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE MSC HEARING DATE 1 2 ORDER Based on the parties’ Stipulation to continue Mandatory Scheduling Conference, and 3 good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: The Mandatory Scheduling 4 Conference in this matter, currently set for February 18, 2016, is vacated and continued to 5 April 28, 2016, at 10:00 a.m., in Department 10. 6 7 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 9, 2016 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 County Counsel Tulare County Visalia, California 3 PARTIES’ JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE MSC HEARING DATE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?