Alba v. County of Tulare, California et al
Filing
43
ORDER directing Clerk of the Court to terminate Defendants 42 signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 8/28/2017. Defendants Bertoldo and Torres terminated. (Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
DENNIS ALBA,
10
11
12
13
Plaintiff
v.
COUNTY OF TULARE, CALIFORNIA,
et al.,
16
ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF
THE COURT TO TERMINATE
DEFENDANTS
(ECF No. 42)
Defendants.
14
15
Case No. 1:15-cv-01492-EPG
On August 22, 2017, Plaintiff Dennis Alba filed a stipulation for voluntary dismissal
dismissing her claims against Defendants Bertoldo and Torres. (ECF No. 42).
17
In light of the parties’ stipulation, the claims against Defendants Bertoldo and Torres have
18
been terminated, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692
19
(9th Cir. 1997), and dismissed with prejudice. Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493, 1506 (9th Cir.
20
1995) (“Even if the defendant has filed a motion to dismiss, the plaintiff may terminate his action
21
voluntarily by filing a notice of dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1).”).
22
23
24
25
Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to terminate Defendants Bertoldo and
Torres as Defendants in this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
August 28, 2017
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
26
27
28
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?