Alba v. County of Tulare, California et al

Filing 9

Parties' Joint STIPULATION and ORDER to Continue the Mandatory Scheduling Conference Hearing Date and Extend Time for Filing of Response to the Complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 12/28/2015. Initial Scheduling Conference currently set for 1/14/2016 is CONTINUED to 2/18/2016 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (EPG) before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean. (Martinez, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 William A. Romaine, #126966 Law Office of William A. Romaine 206 West Lacey Blvd. #309 Hanford, CA 93230 Telephone: (559) 582-9360 Facsimile: (559) 582-9350 Attorney for Plaintiff KATHLEEN BALES-LANGE, #094765 County Counsel for the County of Tulare 7 Judith D. Chapman, #169479 Deputy County Counsel 8 2900 West Burrel, County Civic Center 9 Visalia, California 93291 Telephone: (559) 733-6263 10 Facsimile: (559) 737-4319 6 11 Attorneys for Defendant County of Tulare 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – FRESNO 14 15 DENNIS ALBA, Case Number: 1:15-cv-01492-GSA Plaintiffs, 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 vs. COUNTY OF TULARE, CALIFORNIA, TULARE COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPUTY RONALD CROUCH, TULARE COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, TULARE COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPUTY SERGEANT TORRES, TULARE COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPUTY DERRICK HOOD AND TULARE COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPUTY BERTOLDO, 26 Defendants. JOINT STIPULATION 27 28 County Counsel Tulare County Visalia, California Date: January 14, 2016 Time: 9:00 a.m. Courtroom: 10 Erika J. Grosjean U.S. Magistrate Judge 24 25 PARTIES’ JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE THE MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE HEARING DATE AND EXTEND TIME FOR FILING OF RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT 1 1 Plaintiff, DENNIS ALBA by and through his attorneys of record and Defendants, COUNTY 2 OF TULARE, CALIFORNIA, TULARE COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPUTY RONALD CROUCH, 3 TULARE COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, TULARE COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPUTY 4 SERGEANT TORRES, TULARE COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPUTY DERRICK HOOD AND 5 TULARE COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPUTY BERTOLDO , by and through Tulare County Counsel, 6 Deputy County Counsel, Judith D. Chapman, stipulate as follows: 7 WHEREAS Defendant was served with the Summons and Complaint on December 15, 2015 8 and needs time to gather information regarding the Plaintiff’s claims. In order to meaningfully 9 participate in the meet and confer and the scheduling conference and to prepare a proper response to 10 11 the Complaint; WHEREAS the parties are required pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f), to meet and confer at 12 least twenty-one (21) days prior to the Mandatory Scheduling Conference, the parties agree that 13 counsel for Defendant will be able to meaningfully participate in the conference after she has had 14 time to review the case documents and information. 15 THEREFORE the parties respectfully request that the time to file a response to the 16 Complaint be extended for 18 days and Mandatory Scheduling Conference currently scheduled for 17 January 14, 2016 at 9:00 a.m. be continued for a period of 30 days. 18 IT IS SO STIPULATED BY THE ATTORNEYS OF RECORD AND NAMED HEREIN. 19 20 Dated: _12/23/15_________ LAW OFFICE OF WILLIAM A. ROMAINE 21 ________/s/_________________ William A. Romaine, Attorney for Plaintiff 22 23 24 25 Dated: _12/23/15_________ KATHLEEN BALES-LANGE County Counsel 26 _____/s/_____________________ Judith D. Chapman, Attorney for Defendant County of Tulare 27 28 County Counsel Tulare County Visalia, California 2 1 2 ORDER Based on the parties’ Stipulation to extend time to file the responsive pleading and Continue 3 Mandatory Scheduling Conference, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: The 4 Mandatory Scheduling Conference in this matter, currently set for January 14, 2016, is vacated and 5 continued to February 18, 2016 at 9:00 a.m., in Department 10. Further, the responsive pleading is 6 now due on or before February 1, 2016. 7 8 9 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 28, 2015 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 County Counsel Tulare County Visalia, California 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?