Owens v. Fresno Foods, LLC, et al.
Filing
20
ORDER DISREGARDING PLAINTIFFS REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT AND VACATING MAY 13, 2016 INFORMAL TELEPHONIC CONFERENCE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 5/10/2016. (Hernandez, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
ARTHUR OWENS,
14
ORDER DISREGARDING PLAINTIFF’S
REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT
AND VACATING MAY 13, 2016
INFORMAL TELEPHONIC CONFERENCE
Plaintiff,
12
13
Case No. 1:15-cv-01526---SAB
v.
FRESNO FOODS, LLC, et al.,
(ECF Nos. 16, 18, 19)
Defendants.
15
16
17
On October 7, 2015, Plaintiff Arthur Owens filed this action. The parties stipulated that
18 Defendant Fresno Foods, LLC would have an extension of time to file a responsive pleading.
19 (ECF Nos. 6, 8, 10.) On February 4, 2016, Plaintiff filed a motion for service by publication on
20 Defendant Pauline F. Kouvalas-Prew which was granted on February 25, 2016. (ECF No. 11.)
21 On May 3, 2016, Plaintiff filed a request for entry of default on Defendant Kaouvalas-Prew.
22 (ECF No. 16.) On May 4, 2016, Defendants Fresno Foods, LLC and Kouvalas-Prew filed an
23 answer. (ECF No. 17.) On May 9, 2016, after the Court set an informal teleconference to
24 discuss the request for entry of default, Plaintiff filed a notice of withdrawal of the request for
25 entry of default. (ECF Nos. 18, 19.)
26
Based on the withdrawal of the request for entry of default, the informal telephonic
27 conference set for May 13, 2016, shall be vacated and the parties are not required to appear at
28 that time.
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1.
The request for entry of default filed on May 3, 2016, shall be DISREGARDED
(ECF No. 16); and
3
2.
4
The informal conference set for May 13, 2016 at 10:00 a.m. is VACATED and
the parties are not required to appear at that time.
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8 Dated:
May 10, 2016
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?