Hutchins, Jr. v. Lockyer, et al.
Filing
37
ORDER Adopting 34 Findings and Recommendations to Deny Defendant's 30 Motion to Dismiss; Defendant to File Answer Within Twenty-One Days, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/27/17. (Gonzalez, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CLIFTON HUTCHINS, JR.,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
BILLY LOCKYER, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
No. 1:15-cv-01537-DAD-MJS (PC)
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS TO DENY
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
(Doc. No. 34)
DEFENDANT TO FILE ANSWER WITHIN
TWENTY-ONE DAYS
17
Plaintiff is a prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42
18
19
U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28
20
U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On August 22, 2017, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations
21
22
recommending that defendant Johal’s motion to dismiss be denied. (Doc. No. 34.) The parties
23
were given fourteen days to file objections to those findings and recommendations. More than
24
fourteen days have elapsed and no objections were filed.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, the
25
26
court has conducted a de novo review of this case. The court finds the findings and
27
recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.
28
/////
1
1
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed on August 22, 2017 (Doc. No. 34) are
3
adopted in full; and
2. Defendant Johal is directed to file an answer to plaintiff’s complaint within
4
5
6
7
twenty-one days of this order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
November 27, 2017
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?