Johnson v. City of Ridgecrest

Filing 18

SCHEDULING ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 1/22/2016. Pleading Amendment Deadline 6/24/2016. Discovery Deadlines: Non-Expert 12/12/2016; Expert 1/2/2017. Mid-Discovery Status Conference set for 8/15/2016 at 08:30 AM in Bake rsfield at 510 19th Street (JLT) before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines: Filed by 1/20/2017; Hearing by 2/17/2017. Dispositive Motion Deadlines: Filed by 1/20/2017; Hearing by 3/3/2017. Bench Trial set for 3/28/2017 at 08:30 AM in Bakersfield at 510 19th Street (JLT) before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. (Hall, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

WILLIAM JOHNSON,

12

Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

CITY OF RIDGECREST,

15

Defendant.

16

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

17
18

Case No.: 1:15-CV-01540- JLT
SCHEDULING ORDER (Fed. R. Civ. P. 16)
Pleading Amendment Deadline: 6/24/2016
Discovery Deadlines:
Non-Expert: 12/12/2016
Expert: 1/2/2017
Mid-Discovery Status Conference:
8/15/2016 at 8:30 a.m.
Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines:
Filing: 1/20/2017
Hearing: 2/17/2017

19
20

Dispositive Motion Deadlines:
Filing: 1/20/2017
Hearing: 3/3/2017

21
22

Trial: 3/28/2017 at 8:30 a.m.
510 19th Street, Bakersfield, CA
Bench trial: 2-3 days

23
24
25
26

I.

January 22, 2016.

27
28

Date of Scheduling Conference

///
1

1

II.

Appearances of Counsel

2

Dennis Price appeared on behalf of Plaintiff.

3

Michael Silander appeared on behalf of Defendant.

4

III.

Pleading Amendment Deadline
Any requested pleading amendments are ordered to be filed, either through a stipulation or

5
6

motion to amend, no later than June 24, 2016.

7

IV.

Discovery Plan and Cut-Off Date

8

The parties have exchanged the initial disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1).

9

The parties are ordered to complete all discovery pertaining to non-experts on or before

10
11

December 12, 2016, and all discovery pertaining to experts on or before January 2, 2017.
The parties are directed to disclose all expert witnesses, in writing, on or November 21, 2016,

12

and to disclose all rebuttal experts on or before December 12, 2016. The written designation of

13

retained and non-retained experts shall be made pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 26(a)(2), (A), (B),

14

and (C) and shall include all information required thereunder. Failure to designate experts in

15

compliance with this order may result in the Court excluding the testimony or other evidence offered

16

through such experts that are not disclosed pursuant to this order.

17

The written designation of retained and non-retained experts shall be made pursuant to Fed. R.

18

Civ. P. 26(a)(2), (A), (B), and (C) and shall include all information required thereunder. Failure to

19

designate experts in compliance with this order may result in the Court excluding the testimony or other

20

evidence offered through such experts that are not disclosed pursuant to this order.

21

The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(4) and (5) shall apply to all discovery relating to experts

22

and their opinions. Experts must be fully prepared to be examined on all subjects and opinions

23

included in the designation. Failure to comply will result in the imposition of sanctions, which may

24

include striking the expert designation and preclusion of expert testimony.

25
26
27
28

The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e) regarding a party’s duty to timely supplement
disclosures and responses to discovery requests will be strictly enforced.
A mid-discovery status conference is scheduled for August 15, 2016 at 8:30 a.m. before the
Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, United States Magistrate Judge, at the United States District
2

1

Courthouse located at 510 19th Street, Bakersfield, California. A Joint Mid-Discovery Status

2

Conference Report, carefully prepared and executed by all counsel, shall be electronically filed in

3

CM/ECF, one full week prior to the Conference and shall be e-mailed, in Word format to,

4

[e-mail]. Counsel may appear by telephone via the CourtCall service, provided a

5

written request to so appear is made to the Magistrate Judge's Courtroom Clerk at least five court days

6

before the noticed hearing date.

7

V.

8
9

Pre-Trial Motion Schedule
All non-dispositive pre-trial motions, including any discovery motions, shall be filed no later

than January 20, 2017, and heard on or before February 17, 2017. Non-dispositive motions are heard

10

at 9:00 a.m. at the United States District Courthouse in Bakersfield, California, before the Honorable

11

Jennifer L. Thurston, United States Magistrate Judge.

12

No written discovery motions shall be filed without the prior approval of the assigned

13

Magistrate Judge. A party with a discovery dispute must first confer with the opposing party in a good

14

faith effort to resolve by agreement the issues in dispute. If that good faith effort is unsuccessful, the

15

moving party promptly shall seek a telephonic hearing with all involved parties and the Magistrate

16

Judge. It shall be the obligation of the moving party to arrange and originate the conference call to the

17

court. To schedule this telephonic hearing, the parties are ordered to contact Courtroom Deputy Clerk,

18

Susan Hall at [phone] or via email at [e-mail]. Counsel must comply with

19

Local Rule 251 with respect to discovery disputes or the motion will be denied without prejudice

20

and dropped from calendar.

21

In scheduling such motions, the Magistrate Judge may grant applications for an order shortening

22

time pursuant to Local Rule 144(e). However, if counsel does not obtain an order shortening time, the

23

notice of motion must comply with Local Rule 251.

24

Counsel may appear and argue non-dispositive motions by telephone, provided a written request

25

to so appear is made to the Magistrate Judge's Courtroom Clerk no later than five court days before the

26

noticed hearing date. In the event that more than one attorney requests to appear by telephone then it

27

shall be the obligation of the moving part(ies) to arrange and originate a conference call to the court.

28

All dispositive pre-trial motions shall be filed no later than January 20, 2017, and heard no
3

1

later than March 3, 2017, before the Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, United States Magistrate Judge,

2

at the United States District Courthouse in Bakersfield, California. In scheduling such motions,

3

counsel shall comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 and Local Rules 230 and 260.

4

VI.

Motions for Summary Judgment or Summary Adjudication

5

At least 21 days before filing a motion for summary judgment or motion for summary

6

adjudication, the parties are ORDERED to meet, in person or by telephone, to confer about the issues

7

to be raised in the motion.

8

The purpose of the meeting shall be to: 1) avoid filing motions for summary judgment where a

9

question of fact exists; 2) determine whether the respondent agrees that the motion has merit in whole

10

or in part; 3) discuss whether issues can be resolved without the necessity of briefing; 4) narrow the

11

issues for review by the court; 5) explore the possibility of settlement before the parties incur the

12

expense of briefing a summary judgment motion; and, 6) to develop a joint statement of undisputed

13

facts.
The moving party SHALL initiate the meeting and SHALL provide a complete, proposed

14
15

statement of undisputed facts at least five days before the conference. The finalized joint statement of

16

undisputed facts SHALL include all facts that the parties agree, for purposes of the motion, may be

17

deemed true. In addition to the requirements of Local Rule 260, the moving party shall file the joint

18

statement of undisputed facts.
In the notice of motion the moving party SHALL certify that the parties have met and conferred

19
20

as ordered above, or set forth a statement of good cause for the failure to meet and confer. Failure to

21

comply may result in the motion being stricken.

22

VII.

23

Voluntary Dispute Resolution Program
The parties indicate they wish the Court to refer them to the VDRP but they would like to

24

conduct some discovery before that occurs. Thus, when counsel agree the matter is in a settlement

25

posture, they may file a stipulation seeking a referral to the Court’s VDRP. In the stipulation, they

26

SHALL indicate whether they wish the matter to be stayed pending the completion of the VDRP

27

process or whether they wish to continue the progress of the case simultaneously with the VDRP.

28

Counsel should keep in mind when timing their request for referral to the VDRP, that selection of the
4

1

neutral can take 30 to 60 days.

2

VIII. Trial Date
March 28, 2017, at 8:30 a.m. at the United States District Courthouse in Bakersfield,

3
4

California, before the Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, United States Magistrate Judge.

5

A.

This is a bench trial.

6

B.

Counsels' Estimate of Trial Time: 2-3 days.

7

C.

Counsels' attention is directed to Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of

8

California, Rule 285.

9

IX.

Settlement Conference
If the parties desire a conference with the Court after completing the VDRP or in its stead, they

10
11

may file a joint written request for a settlement conference.

12

X.

13

Trial
Not applicable at this time.

14
15

XI.

18

Related Matters Pending
There are no pending related matters.

16
17

Request for Bifurcation, Appointment of Special Master, or other Techniques to Shorten

XII.

Compliance with Federal Procedure
All counsel are expected to familiarize themselves with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

19

and the Local Rules of Practice of the Eastern District of California, and to keep abreast of any

20

amendments thereto. The Court must insist upon compliance with these Rules to efficiently handle its

21

increasing case load, and sanctions will be imposed for failure to follow both the Federal Rules of Civil

22

Procedure and the Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of California.

23

XIII. Effect of this Order

24

The foregoing order represents the best estimate of the court and counsel as to the agenda most

25

suitable to dispose of this case. The trial date reserved is specifically reserved for this case. If the

26

parties determine at any time that the schedule outlined in this order cannot be met, counsel are ordered

27

to notify the court immediately of that fact so that adjustments may be made, either by stipulation or by

28

subsequent status conference.
5

1

The dates set in this Order are considered to be firm and will not be modified absent a

2

showing of good cause even if the request to modify is made by stipulation. Stipulations

3

extending the deadlines contained herein will not be considered unless they are accompanied by

4

affidavits or declarations, and where appropriate attached exhibits, which establish good cause

5

for granting the relief requested.

6

Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions.

7

8
9
10

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

January 22, 2016

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

23
24
25
26
27
28
6