Green v. Sherman, et al.

Filing 22

ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's 19 Motion for Clarification signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 1/23/2017. (Sant Agata, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

CEDRIC EUGENE GREEN,

12
Plaintiff

13
14
15
16

v.

CASE NO. 1:15-cv-1548-LJO-MJS (PC)
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION
(ECF NO. 19)

FRANKLIN, et al.,
Defendants.

17
18

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil

19

rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On December 27, 2016, the undersigned

20

issued Findings and Recommendations recommending that Plaintiff be allowed to

21

proceed on his First Amendment claim against Defendants Franklin and Ramos. (ECF

22

No. 17.) Those Findings and Recommendations were adopted in full by the district judge

23

assigned to this case on January 19, 2017, and Plaintiff was directed to submit service

24

documents within thirty days from the date of the Order. (ECF No. 20.)

25

In the interim, Plaintiff filed a motion for clarification, stating that he had not yet

26

received the documents necessary to effectuate service on the Defendants. Plaintiff is

27

hereby informed that those documents were ordered to be mailed to him only upon the

28

district judge’s adoption of the Findings and Recommendations. Plaintiff should receive
1

1
2
3
4

those documents shortly. Once he receives them, he is advised to adhere to the
submission deadline set forth in the district judge’s order.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s January 9, 2017, motion for
clarification (ECF No. 19) is GRANTED.

5
6
7
8

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

January 23, 2017

/s/

Michael J. Seng

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2