Green v. Sherman, et al.

Filing 45

ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 36 Motion Objecting to Any Extension of Time for Defendants to Respond to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 11/30/17. (Gonzalez, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 CEDRIC EUGENE GREEN, 11 Plaintiff 12 v. 13 14 FRANKLIN, et al., 15 Defendants. CASE NO. 1:15-cv-1548-LJO-MJS (PC) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION OBJECTING TO ANY EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (ECF NO. 36) 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion objecting to any extension of time for Defendants to respond to Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint. Since that pleading was dismissed on June 8, 2017, for failure to state a claim (see ECF No. 35), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion (ECF No. 36) is DENIED as moot. IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 27 Dated: November 30, 2017 /s/ Michael J. Seng UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?