Green v. Sherman, et al.

Filing 45

ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 36 Motion Objecting to Any Extension of Time for Defendants to Respond to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 11/30/17. (Gonzalez, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

CEDRIC EUGENE GREEN,

11
Plaintiff

12
v.

13
14

FRANKLIN, et al.,

15

Defendants.

CASE NO. 1:15-cv-1548-LJO-MJS (PC)
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION OBJECTING TO ANY
EXTENSION OF TIME FOR
DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO
PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT
(ECF NO. 36)

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil
rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s
motion objecting to any extension of time for Defendants to respond to Plaintiff’s First
Amended Complaint. Since that pleading was dismissed on June 8, 2017, for failure to
state a claim (see ECF No. 35), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion (ECF
No. 36) is DENIED as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

25
26
27

Dated:

November 30, 2017

/s/

Michael J. Seng

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

28
1