Willis v. Kandkhorova
Filing
28
ORDER approving in part 27 Stipulation for Stay of Case signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 2/21/2017. (Case Management Deadline: 8/24/2017). (Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
AVERILLE WILLIS,
10
Plaintiff,
11
CASE No. 1:15-cv-01572-AWI-MJS (PC)
ORDER
APPROVING,
IN
PART,
STIPULATION FOR STAY OF CASE
v.
(ECF NO. 27)
12
NELLYA KANDKHOROVA,
13
Defendant.
14
15
Plaintiff is a former state prisoner proceeding in forma pauperis and with counsel
16
in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter proceeds against
17
Defendant Kandkhorova on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment claim for inadequate medical
18
care.
19
On February 16, 2017, the parties filed a stipulation and request to stay the case.
20
(ECF No. 27.) The request is based on a recent adjudication by the Tehama County
21
Superior Court finding Plaintiff incompetent to stand trial in an unrelated criminal action.
22
They request a six month stay, following which the parties agree to meet and confer
23
regarding Plaintiff’s competency status.
24
While the Court agrees that Plaintiff’s competency status warrants a stay, the
25
Court must maintain control of its docket and ensure that cases do not sit idly without
26
reason. Accordingly, the Court will stay the matter for 120 days, and will require the
27
parties to submit a joint status report regarding Plaintiff’s competency status ninety days
28
from the date of this order.
1
1
Based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The parties’ request to stay the case is GRANTED IN PART;
3
2. The matter is STAYED for 120 days due to Plaintiff’s competency status;
4
and
3. The parties shall file a joint status report regarding Plaintiff’s competency
5
6
status within ninety days from the date of this order.
7
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
February 21, 2017
/s/
10
Michael J. Seng
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?