McCoy v. Soto

Filing 34

ORDER Regarding 33 Petitioner's Motion Requesting Copies signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 5/18/2017. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTHONY MCCOY, Case No. 1:15-cv-01578-LJO-EPG-HC ORDER REGARDING PETITIONER’S MOTION REQUESTING COPIES Petitioner, 12 v. 13 (ECF No. 33) 14 JOHN SOTO, Respondent. 15 16 17 Petitioner is proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 18 U.S.C. § 2254. 19 On May 17, 2017, the Court received the instant motion, requesting that the Court 20 provide copies of Petitioner’s response (ECF No. 32) to Petitioner and Respondent. (ECF No. 21 33). Petitioner alleges that he is unable to make copies for his personal file and to serve on 22 Respondent due to “an institutional denial of access to the law library and copier.” (ECF No. 33 23 at 1). 24 In light of Petitioner’s difficulty in copying documents, the Court will provide Petitioner 25 a courtesy copy and waive Petitioner’s obligation to separately serve Respondent a copy of 26 Petitioner’s response. As Petitioner has filed his response with the Court, Respondent has 27 received a copy of the document via CM/ECF, which will constitute service. 28 /// 1 1 Accordingly, the Court DIRECTS the Clerk’s Office to mail a copy of Petitioner’s 2 response (ECF No. 32) to Petitioner. 3 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 18, 2017 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?