Sahibi v. Gonzales. et al.

Filing 84

ORDER DEEMING Defendants' Motion to Compel WITHDRAWN 63 , signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 2/6/17. (Hellings, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 OUSSAMA SAHIBI, 11 12 13 Plaintiff, CASE No. 1:15-cv-01581-LJO-MJS (PC) ORDER DEEMING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL WITHDRAWN v. (ECF NO. 63) BORJAS GONZALES, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil 18 rights action brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1983. The action proceeds on Plaintiff’s 19 Eighth Amendment excessive force claim against Defendants Brandon Cope, Borjas 20 Gonzales, Mario Lozano, Howard Smith, and Stan, and on a Fourteenth Amendment 21 due process claim against Defendant Crounse. 22 On November 3, 2016, Defendants Cope, Gonzales, Lozano, and Stan filed a 23 motion to compel, stating that Plaintiff had failed to respond to discovery requests. (ECF 24 No. 63.) 25 Plaintiff did not file an opposition. However, on November 22, 2016 and 26 November 28, 2016, he filed motions seeking an extension of time to respond to 27 Defendants’ discovery requests. (ECF Nos. 67, 68.) Plaintiff stated that the requests 28 1 1 required him to review his medical records and, although he had sought permission to do 2 so, such opportunity had not been afforded him. 3 The Court set the matter for a telephonic discovery dispute conference. (ECF No. 4 70.) In documents submitted in preparation for the conference, Defendants noted 5 Plaintiff’s contention that his only responsive documents are CDCR medical records he 6 has not been allowed to review. On that basis, they asked to withdraw their motion to 7 compel, provided that Plaintiff be prohibited from presenting any evidence outside of the 8 CDCR medical records and not disclosed in the discovery process. 9 On January 13, 2017, the Court held the telephonic discovery dispute conference. 10 (ECF No. 81.) Therein, Defendants agreed to confer with Plaintiff’s Litigation Coordinator 11 to attempt to enable Plaintiff’s review of his medical file prior to January 20, 2017. 12 Plaintiff was ordered to advise the Court and counsel by January 30, 2017 if he intended 13 to present medical records not contained in his CDCR file. To date, Plaintiff has 14 submitted no such statement of intent. 15 Based on the foregoing, it appears that Plaintiff does not intend to present 16 medical records outside of those contained in his CDCR medical file. Accordingly, 17 Defendants’ motion to compel (ECF No. 63) is HEREBY DEEMED WITHDRAW 18 pursuant to Defendants’ request. 19 20 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 6, 2017 /s/ 22 Michael J. Seng UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?