Snow v. Kay

Filing 43

ORDER Directing Defendant to File a Response to Plaintiff's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal within Ten Days of the Date of Service of this Order signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 03/01/2017. (Flores, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WILLIAM L. SNOW, 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, v. DOCTOR SHWE, Defendant. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:15-cv-01606-SAB (PC) ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT TO FILE A RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHIN TEN DAYS OF THE DATE OF SERVICE OF THIS ORDER [ECF No. 42] Plaintiff William L. Snow is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding against Defendant Dr. Shwe for deliberate indifference to a serious medical need in violation of the Eighth Amendment. On December 22, 2016, Defendant filed an answer to the complaint. On January 9, 2017, the Court issued the discovery and scheduling order. On February 27, 2017, Plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal. Because Defendant has 24 filed an answer, Plaintiff cannot automatically dismiss the action through the notice of voluntary 25 dismissal. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2). 26 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2) provides that after an answer or motion for summary 27 judgment has been filed, “an action may be dismissed at the plaintiff’s request only by court order, on 28 terms that the court considers proper.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2). 1 Accordingly, within ten (10) days from the date of service of this order, Defendant shall file an 1 2 opposition or statement of non-opposition to Plaintiff’s notice of voluntary dismissal. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Dated: 6 March 1, 2017 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?