Allen v. Kramer et al
Filing
75
ORDER Setting Telephonic Status Conference, signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 8/5/19. (Marrujo, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DAVID ALLEN,
12
13
Case No. 1:15-cv-01609-DAD-JDP
Plaintiff,
ORDER SETTING TELEPHONIC STATUS
CONFERENCE
v.
14
STEPHEN MAYBERG, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff David Allen, a civil detainee, proceeds without counsel in this civil rights action
18
brought under 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983. The court will hold a telephonic status conference on August
19
13, 2019 at 2:00 p.m. The parties should prepare to discuss the following issues at the status
20
conference: (1) whether plaintiff still faces the risk of contracting Valley Fever; (2) whether
21
plaintiff wishes the court to recruit him counsel; (3) whether the parties have any interest in
22
settlement; (4) how this case should proceed; and (5) any other measure that would secure speedy
23
and efficient resolution of this case.
24
First, the court will inquire whether plaintiff still faces the danger of contracting Valley
25
Fever. Defendants have already implemented some measures against Valley Fever, ECF No. 71
26
at 13-14, but the parties should prepare to inform the court whether the measures already in place
27
adequately protect plaintiff. The parties need not provide an exhaustive list of the measures in
28
place, but both sides should explain why they believe that the measures are adequate or
1
1
inadequate. We expect to use this information to decide whether to allow another round of
2
dispositive motions and whether to recruit counsel for plaintiff.
3
Second, plaintiff should inform the court whether he wishes to be represented by counsel.
4
If plaintiff wants counsel, he should be prepared to (1) inform the court why he believes that he
5
will prevail, (2) describe his litigation experience, and (3) provide any other information that
6
would help the court assess his ability to represent himself or articulate his claims. We are
7
inclined to recruit counsel for plaintiff because, even if he does not face any danger of contracting
8
Valley Fever, the issues presented in this case are complex and numerous.1
9
Third, the parties should prepare to discuss whether they have any interest in settlement.
10
Although plaintiff seeks injunctive relief for his personal safety in addition to monetary
11
compensation, we are cognizant that the state government could take formal or informal measures
12
against Valley Fever. If the parties agree to attend a settlement conference, we are inclined to
13
recruit counsel who would assist plaintiff at the conference.
14
Fourth, if the parties have no interest in settlement, we will issue a new scheduling order.
15
Because some of the claims were inadvertently dismissed and plaintiff was mistakenly
16
characterized as a prisoner, ECF No. 71 at 6-7, we will likely allow additional discovery and
17
another round of dispositive motions on the merits. The parties may persuade us otherwise.
18
Order
19
1. The court will hold a telephonic status conference on August 13, 2019, at 2:00 p.m.
20
(dial-in number: 1-888-204-5984; passcode: 4446176) to discuss matters identified
21
above.
22
2. Plaintiff must make arrangements with staff at his institution of confinement for his
23
attendance at the conference.
24
a. Plaintiff's institution of confinement must make plaintiff available for the
25
telephonic conference.
26
27
28
1
Earlier in the case, we invited the plaintiff to identify any mental illness that he might suffer
from, noting that such information would help the court assess the need for counsel. Plaintiff
need not identify any mental condition for the court to recruit counsel in this case.
2
1
b. Before the conference, defense counsel must confirm with plaintiff's
2
institution of confinement that arrangements have been made for plaintiff's
3
attendance.
4
c. The clerk is directed to send a copy of this order to the litigation
5
coordinator at plaintiff's institution of confinement.
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
Dated:
August 5, 2019
9
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
No. 202
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?