Allen v. Kramer et al

Filing 86

ORDER DENYING 77 Motion to Stay, signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 2/28/20. (Gonzalez, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

DAVID ALLEN,

12

Case No. 1:15-cv-01609-DAD-JDP
Plaintiff,

13

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
TO STAY THE CASE

v.
ECF No. 77

14

CLIFF ALLENBY, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
Plaintiff moves the court to stay this case while awaiting a Ninth Circuit decision in

17
18

another case. ECF No. 77. In seeking a stay, plaintiff raises the same arguments that defendants

19

made earlier in the case—arguments that we have already evaluated and denied.1 See ECF No.

20

71 at 7-8. Thus, plaintiff has failed to provide good cause for a stay, and we deny his motion.

21

We note that the court currently is attempting to identify counsel to assist plaintiff.

22
23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24
Dated:
25

February 28, 2020
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

26
27
28

1

If both parties agree a stay is appropriate, they might consider seeking a stipulated stay.