Doe v. County of Kern, et al.
Filing
20
SCHEDULING ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 4/5/2016. Pleading Amendment Deadline 7/1/2016. Discovery Deadlines: Initial Disclosures 4/11/2016; Non-Expert 9/9/2016; Expert 11/14/2016. Mid-Discovery Status Conference set for 7/7/2016 at 09:00 AM in Bakersfield at 510 19th Street (JLT) before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines: Filed by 11/21/2016; Hearing by 12/19/2016. Dispositive Motion Deadlines: Filed by 1/20/2017; Hearing by 2/21/2017. Settlement Conference set for 3/24/2017 at 01:30 PM in Bakersfield at 510 19th Street (JLT) before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. Pretrial Conference set for 4/17/2017 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5 (DAD) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd. Jury Trial set for 6/13/2017 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 5 (DAD) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd. (Hall, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
JANE DOE,
Plaintiff,
11
12
13
14
15
v.
COUNTY OF KERN, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:15-CV-01637 - DAD - JLT
SCHEDULING ORDER (Fed. R. Civ. P. 16)
Pleading Amendment Deadline: 7/1/2016
Discovery Deadlines:
Initial Disclosures: 4/11/2016
Non-Expert: 9/9/2016
Expert: 11/14/2016
Mid-Discovery Status Conference:
7/7/2016 at 9:00 a.m.
16
17
Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines:
Filing: 11/21/2016
Hearing: 12/19/2016
18
19
Dispositive Motion Deadlines:
Filing: 1/10/2017
Hearing: 2/21/2017
20
21
22
Settlement Conference:
3/24/2017 at 1:30 p.m.
23
24
Pre-Trial Conference:
4/17/2017 at 1:30 p.m.
Courtroom 5
25
26
Trial:
27
28
1
6/13/2017 at 8:30 a.m.
Courtroom 5
Jury trial: 10-12 days
1
I.
April 4, 2016.
2
3
Date of Scheduling Conference
II.
Appearances of Counsel
4
Neil Gehlawat appeared on behalf of Plaintiff.
5
Andrew Thomson appeared on behalf of the County of Kern.
6
James Weakley appeared on behalf of Cesar Navejar.
7
III.
Any requested pleading amendments are ordered to be filed, either through a stipulation or
8
9
10
11
12
13
Pleading Amendment Deadline
motion to amend, no later than July 1, 2016.
IV.
Discovery Plan and Cut-Off Date
The parties are ordered to exchange the initial disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)
on or before April 11, 2016.
Defendants requests the Court expand the number of depositions to 15. Defendants report that
14
the additional depositions are needed to discover Plaintiff’s claims and to properly evaluate her
15
credibility. Plaintiff disagrees with this request and is concerned that Defendants will attempt to depose
16
people who cannot contribute information on issues raised in the complaint. The Court understands
17
this concern and is prepared to assist with informal discovery conferences as needed to resolve disputes
18
on this point. (See Headnote V. below) Thus, the Court modifies the discovery limitations and
19
expands the number of depositions per side to 15, excluding expert depositions.
20
21
22
The parties are ordered to complete all discovery pertaining to non-experts on or before
September 9, 2016, and all discovery pertaining to experts on or before November 14, 2016.
The parties are directed to disclose all expert witnesses1, in writing, on or before September 19,
23
2016, and to disclose all rebuttal experts on or before October 17, 2016. The written designation of
24
retained and non-retained experts shall be made pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 26(a)(2), (A), (B),
25
and (C) and shall include all information required thereunder. Failure to designate experts in
26
compliance with this order may result in the Court excluding the testimony or other evidence offered
27
28
1
In the event an expert will offer opinions related to an independent medical or mental health evaluation, the
examination SHALL occur sufficiently in advance of the disclosure deadline so the expert’s report fully details the expert’s
opinions in this regard.
2
1
through such experts that are not disclosed pursuant to this order.
The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(4) and (5) shall apply to all discovery relating to experts
2
3
and their opinions. Experts must be fully prepared to be examined on all subjects and opinions
4
included in the designation. Failure to comply will result in the imposition of sanctions, which may
5
include striking the expert designation and preclusion of expert testimony.
The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e) regarding a party's duty to timely supplement
6
7
disclosures and responses to discovery requests will be strictly enforced.
8
A mid-discovery status conference is scheduled for July 7, 2016 at 9:00 a.m. before the
9
Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, U.S. Magistrate Judge, located at 510 19th Street, Bakersfield,
10
California, 93301. Counsel SHALL file a joint mid-discovery status conference report, one week
11
before the conference. Counsel SHALL also e-mail the report in Word or .pdf format to
12
JLTOrders@caed.uscourts.gov. The joint statement SHALL outline the discovery that has been
13
completed and that which needs to be completed as well as any impediments to completing the
14
discovery within the deadlines set forth in this order. Counsel may appear via CourtCall, providing a
15
written request to so appear is made to the Magistrate Judge's Courtroom Clerk no later than five court
16
days before the noticed hearing date.
17
V.
Pre-Trial Motion Schedule
18
All non-dispositive pre-trial motions, including any discovery motions, shall be filed no later
19
than November 21, 2016, and heard on or before December 19, 2016. Non-dispositive motions are
20
heard before the Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, United States Magistrate Judge at the United States
21
Courthouse in Bakersfield, California.
22
No written discovery motions shall be filed without the prior approval of the assigned
23
Magistrate Judge. A party with a discovery dispute must first confer with the opposing party in a good
24
faith effort to resolve by agreement the issues in dispute. If that good faith effort is unsuccessful, the
25
moving party promptly shall seek a telephonic hearing with all involved parties and the Magistrate
26
Judge. It shall be the obligation of the moving party to arrange and originate the conference call to the
27
court. To schedule this telephonic hearing, the parties are ordered to contact Courtroom Deputy Clerk,
28
Susan Hall at (661) 326-6620 or via email at SHall@caed.uscourts.gov. Counsel must comply with
3
1
Local Rule 251 with respect to discovery disputes or the motion will be denied without prejudice
2
and dropped from calendar.
In scheduling such motions, the Magistrate Judge may grant applications for an order shortening
3
4
time pursuant to Local Rule 144(e). However, if counsel does not obtain an order shortening time, the
5
notice of motion must comply with Local Rule 251.
Counsel may appear and argue non-dispositive motions via CourtCall, providing a written
6
7
request to so appear is made to the Magistrate Judge's Courtroom Clerk no later than five court days
8
before the noticed hearing date.
All dispositive pre-trial motions shall be filed no later than January 10, 2017, and heard on or
9
10
before February 21, 2017, in Courtroom 5 at 9:30 a.m. before the Honorable Dale A. Drozd, United
11
States District Court Judge. In scheduling such motions, counsel shall comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 56
12
and Local Rules 230 and 260.
13
VI.
Motions for Summary Judgment or Summary Adjudication
14
At least 21 days before filing a motion for summary judgment or motion for summary
15
adjudication, the parties are ORDERED to meet, in person or by telephone, to confer about the issues
16
to be raised in the motion.
17
The purpose of the meeting shall be to: 1) avoid filing motions for summary judgment where a
18
question of fact exists; 2) determine whether the respondent agrees that the motion has merit in whole
19
or in part; 3) discuss whether issues can be resolved without the necessity of briefing; 4) narrow the
20
issues for review by the court; 5) explore the possibility of settlement before the parties incur the
21
expense of briefing a summary judgment motion; and, 6) to develop a joint statement of undisputed
22
facts.
23
The moving party SHALL initiate the meeting and SHALL provide a complete, proposed
24
statement of undisputed facts at least five days before the conference. The finalized joint statement of
25
undisputed facts SHALL include all facts that the parties agree, for purposes of the motion, may be
26
deemed true. In addition to the requirements of Local Rule 260, the moving party shall file the joint
27
statement of undisputed facts.
28
In the notice of motion the moving party SHALL certify that the parties have met and conferred
4
1
as ordered above, or set forth a statement of good cause for the failure to meet and confer. Failure to
2
comply may result in the motion being stricken.
3
VII.
Pre-Trial Conference Date
4
April 17, 2017, at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 5 before Judge Drozd.
5
The parties are ordered to file a Joint Pretrial Statement pursuant to Local Rule 281(a)(2).
6
The parties are further directed to submit a digital copy of their pretrial statement in Word format,
7
directly to Judge Drozd's chambers, by email at DADorders@caed.uscourts.gov.
Counsels' attention is directed to Rules 281 and 282 of the Local Rules of Practice for the
8
9
Eastern District of California, as to the obligations of counsel in preparing for the pre-trial conference.
10
The Court will insist upon strict compliance with those rules. In addition to the matters set forth in the
11
Local Rules the Joint Pretrial Statement shall include a Joint Statement of the case to be used by the
12
Court to explain the nature of the case to the jury during voir dire.
13
VIII. Trial Date
June 13, 20172, at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 5 before the Honorable Dale A. Drozd, United States
14
15
District Court Judge.
16
A.
This is a jury trial.
17
B.
Counsels' Estimate of Trial Time: 10-12 days.
18
C.
Counsels' attention is directed to Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of
19
California, Rule 285.
20
IX.
Settlement Conference
21
A Settlement Conference is scheduled for March 24, 2017 at 1:30 p.m. before the Honorable
22
Jennifer L. Thurston and the United States District Courthouse located at 510 19th Street, Bakersfield,
23
CA. If any party prefers the settlement conference be conducted by a judicial officer not assigned
24
to this case, that party SHALL notify the Court at least 60 days in advance of the conference to
25
allow a different judicial officer to be assigned.
26
27
28
2
Mr. Weakley has another set for trial on June 19, 2017, which may present a conflict for this trial. However,
given his heavy trial calendar, trial dates are not available for him until September 2017 or later. Thus, the Court
selected this trial date with the understanding that Mr. Weakley may need to seek a continuance of the trial date if his
other matter, which was previously scheduled, does not resolve.
5
1
Unless otherwise permitted in advance by the Court, the attorneys who will try the case shall
2
appear at the Settlement Conference with the parties and the person or persons having full authority
3
to negotiate and settle the case on any terms3 at the conference. Consideration of settlement is a
4
serious matter that requires preparation prior to the settlement conference. Set forth below are the
5
procedures the Court will employ, absent good cause, in conducting the conference.
6
At least 21 days before the settlement conference, Plaintiff SHALL submit to Defendant via
7
fax or e-mail, a written itemization of damages and a meaningful4 settlement demand which includes a
8
brief explanation of why such a settlement is appropriate. Thereafter, no later than 14 days before the
9
settlement conference, Defendant SHALL respond, via fax or e-mail, with an acceptance of the offer or
10
with a meaningful counteroffer, which includes a brief explanation of why such a settlement is
11
appropriate.
12
If settlement is not achieved, each party SHALL attach copies of their settlement offers to their
13
Confidential Settlement Conference Statement, as described below. Copies of these documents shall
14
not be filed on the court docket.
CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT
15
16
At least five court days before the Settlement Conference, the parties shall submit, directly to
17
Judge Thurston's chambers by e-mail to EPGorders@caed.uscourts.gov, a Confidential Settlement
18
Conference Statement. The statement should not be filed with the Clerk of the Court nor served on
19
any other party, although the parties may file a Notice of Lodging of Settlement Conference
20
Statement. Each statement shall be clearly marked "confidential" with the date and time of the
21
Settlement Conference indicated prominently thereon.
22
The Confidential Settlement Conference Statement shall include the following:
23
A.
A brief statement of the facts of the case.
24
B.
A brief statement of the claims and defenses, i.e., statutory or other grounds upon which
25
26
27
28
3
Insurance carriers, business organizations, and governmental bodies or agencies whose settlement agreements
are subject to approval by legislative bodies, executive committees, boards of directors or the like shall be represented by a
person or persons who occupy high executive positions in the party organization and who will be directly involved in the
process of approval of any settlement offers or agreements. To the extent possible the representative shall have the
authority, if he or she deems it appropriate, to settle the action on terms consistent with the opposing party's most recent
demand.
4
“Meaningful” means that the offer is reasonably calculated to settle the case on terms acceptable to the offering
party. “Meaningful” does not include an offer which the offering party knows will not be acceptable to the other party.
6
1
the claims are founded; a forthright evaluation of the parties' likelihood of prevailing on
2
the claims and defenses; and a description of the major issues in dispute.
3
C.
A summary of the proceedings to date.
4
D.
An estimate of the cost and time to be expended for further discovery, pretrial and trial.
5
E.
The relief sought.
6
F.
The party's position on settlement, including present demands and offers and a history of
past settlement discussions, offers and demands.
7
8
X.
Request for Bifurcation, Appointment of Special Master, or other
Techniques to Shorten Trial
9
10
The parties disagree as to whether the trial should be trifurcated (with individual liability,
11
Monell liability and punitive damages liability all tied separately) or bifurcated (individual liability and
12
Monell liability tried together with the issue of punitive damages tried after). The parties will raise this
13
issue in their joint pretrial conference statement.
14
XI.
There are no pending related matters.
15
16
17
Related Matters Pending
XII.
Compliance with Federal Procedure
All counsel are expected to familiarize themselves with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
18
and the Local Rules of Practice of the Eastern District of California, and to keep abreast of any
19
amendments thereto. The Court must insist upon compliance with these Rules if it is to efficiently
20
handle its increasing case load and sanctions will be imposed for failure to follow the Rules as provided
21
in both the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of
22
California.
23
XIV. Effect of this Order
24
The foregoing order represents the best estimate of the court and counsel as to the agenda most
25
suitable to dispose of this case. The trial date reserved is specifically reserved for this case. If the
26
parties determine at any time that the schedule outlined in this order cannot be met, counsel are ordered
27
to notify the court immediately of that fact so that adjustments may be made, either by stipulation or by
28
subsequent status conference.
7
1
The dates set in this Order are considered to be firm and will not be modified absent a
2
showing of good cause even if the request to modify is made by stipulation. Stipulations
3
extending the deadlines contained herein will not be considered unless they are accompanied by
4
affidavits or declarations, and where appropriate attached exhibits, which establish good cause
5
for granting the relief requested.
6
Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions.
7
8
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
April 5, 2016
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
8
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?