Doe v. County of Kern, et al.

Filing 20

SCHEDULING ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 4/5/2016. Pleading Amendment Deadline 7/1/2016. Discovery Deadlines: Initial Disclosures 4/11/2016; Non-Expert 9/9/2016; Expert 11/14/2016. Mid-Discovery Status Conference set for 7/7/2016 at 09:00 AM in Bakersfield at 510 19th Street (JLT) before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines: Filed by 11/21/2016; Hearing by 12/19/2016. Dispositive Motion Deadlines: Filed by 1/20/2017; Hearing by 2/21/2017. Settlement Conference set for 3/24/2017 at 01:30 PM in Bakersfield at 510 19th Street (JLT) before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. Pretrial Conference set for 4/17/2017 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5 (DAD) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd. Jury Trial set for 6/13/2017 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 5 (DAD) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd. (Hall, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

JANE DOE,
Plaintiff,

11
12
13
14
15

v.
COUNTY OF KERN, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 1:15-CV-01637 - DAD - JLT
SCHEDULING ORDER (Fed. R. Civ. P. 16)
Pleading Amendment Deadline: 7/1/2016
Discovery Deadlines:
Initial Disclosures: 4/11/2016
Non-Expert: 9/9/2016
Expert: 11/14/2016
Mid-Discovery Status Conference:
7/7/2016 at 9:00 a.m.

16
17

Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines:
Filing: 11/21/2016
Hearing: 12/19/2016

18
19

Dispositive Motion Deadlines:
Filing: 1/10/2017
Hearing: 2/21/2017

20
21
22

Settlement Conference:
3/24/2017 at 1:30 p.m.

23
24

Pre-Trial Conference:
4/17/2017 at 1:30 p.m.
Courtroom 5

25
26

Trial:

27
28
1

6/13/2017 at 8:30 a.m.
Courtroom 5
Jury trial: 10-12 days

1

I.

April 4, 2016.

2
3

Date of Scheduling Conference

II.

Appearances of Counsel

4

Neil Gehlawat appeared on behalf of Plaintiff.

5

Andrew Thomson appeared on behalf of the County of Kern.

6

James Weakley appeared on behalf of Cesar Navejar.

7

III.

Any requested pleading amendments are ordered to be filed, either through a stipulation or

8
9
10
11
12
13

Pleading Amendment Deadline

motion to amend, no later than July 1, 2016.
IV.

Discovery Plan and Cut-Off Date
The parties are ordered to exchange the initial disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)

on or before April 11, 2016.
Defendants requests the Court expand the number of depositions to 15. Defendants report that

14

the additional depositions are needed to discover Plaintiff’s claims and to properly evaluate her

15

credibility. Plaintiff disagrees with this request and is concerned that Defendants will attempt to depose

16

people who cannot contribute information on issues raised in the complaint. The Court understands

17

this concern and is prepared to assist with informal discovery conferences as needed to resolve disputes

18

on this point. (See Headnote V. below) Thus, the Court modifies the discovery limitations and

19

expands the number of depositions per side to 15, excluding expert depositions.

20
21
22

The parties are ordered to complete all discovery pertaining to non-experts on or before
September 9, 2016, and all discovery pertaining to experts on or before November 14, 2016.
The parties are directed to disclose all expert witnesses1, in writing, on or before September 19,

23

2016, and to disclose all rebuttal experts on or before October 17, 2016. The written designation of

24

retained and non-retained experts shall be made pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 26(a)(2), (A), (B),

25

and (C) and shall include all information required thereunder. Failure to designate experts in

26

compliance with this order may result in the Court excluding the testimony or other evidence offered

27
28

1

In the event an expert will offer opinions related to an independent medical or mental health evaluation, the
examination SHALL occur sufficiently in advance of the disclosure deadline so the expert’s report fully details the expert’s
opinions in this regard.

2

1

through such experts that are not disclosed pursuant to this order.
The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(4) and (5) shall apply to all discovery relating to experts

2
3

and their opinions. Experts must be fully prepared to be examined on all subjects and opinions

4

included in the designation. Failure to comply will result in the imposition of sanctions, which may

5

include striking the expert designation and preclusion of expert testimony.
The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e) regarding a party's duty to timely supplement

6
7

disclosures and responses to discovery requests will be strictly enforced.

8

A mid-discovery status conference is scheduled for July 7, 2016 at 9:00 a.m. before the

9

Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, U.S. Magistrate Judge, located at 510 19th Street, Bakersfield,

10

California, 93301. Counsel SHALL file a joint mid-discovery status conference report, one week

11

before the conference. Counsel SHALL also e-mail the report in Word or .pdf format to

12

[e-mail]. The joint statement SHALL outline the discovery that has been

13

completed and that which needs to be completed as well as any impediments to completing the

14

discovery within the deadlines set forth in this order. Counsel may appear via CourtCall, providing a

15

written request to so appear is made to the Magistrate Judge's Courtroom Clerk no later than five court

16

days before the noticed hearing date.

17

V.

Pre-Trial Motion Schedule

18

All non-dispositive pre-trial motions, including any discovery motions, shall be filed no later

19

than November 21, 2016, and heard on or before December 19, 2016. Non-dispositive motions are

20

heard before the Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, United States Magistrate Judge at the United States

21

Courthouse in Bakersfield, California.

22

No written discovery motions shall be filed without the prior approval of the assigned

23

Magistrate Judge. A party with a discovery dispute must first confer with the opposing party in a good

24

faith effort to resolve by agreement the issues in dispute. If that good faith effort is unsuccessful, the

25

moving party promptly shall seek a telephonic hearing with all involved parties and the Magistrate

26

Judge. It shall be the obligation of the moving party to arrange and originate the conference call to the

27

court. To schedule this telephonic hearing, the parties are ordered to contact Courtroom Deputy Clerk,

28

Susan Hall at [phone] or via email at [e-mail]. Counsel must comply with
3

1

Local Rule 251 with respect to discovery disputes or the motion will be denied without prejudice

2

and dropped from calendar.
In scheduling such motions, the Magistrate Judge may grant applications for an order shortening

3
4

time pursuant to Local Rule 144(e). However, if counsel does not obtain an order shortening time, the

5

notice of motion must comply with Local Rule 251.
Counsel may appear and argue non-dispositive motions via CourtCall, providing a written

6
7

request to so appear is made to the Magistrate Judge's Courtroom Clerk no later than five court days

8

before the noticed hearing date.
All dispositive pre-trial motions shall be filed no later than January 10, 2017, and heard on or

9
10

before February 21, 2017, in Courtroom 5 at 9:30 a.m. before the Honorable Dale A. Drozd, United

11

States District Court Judge. In scheduling such motions, counsel shall comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 56

12

and Local Rules 230 and 260.

13

VI.

Motions for Summary Judgment or Summary Adjudication

14

At least 21 days before filing a motion for summary judgment or motion for summary

15

adjudication, the parties are ORDERED to meet, in person or by telephone, to confer about the issues

16

to be raised in the motion.

17

The purpose of the meeting shall be to: 1) avoid filing motions for summary judgment where a

18

question of fact exists; 2) determine whether the respondent agrees that the motion has merit in whole

19

or in part; 3) discuss whether issues can be resolved without the necessity of briefing; 4) narrow the

20

issues for review by the court; 5) explore the possibility of settlement before the parties incur the

21

expense of briefing a summary judgment motion; and, 6) to develop a joint statement of undisputed

22

facts.

23

The moving party SHALL initiate the meeting and SHALL provide a complete, proposed

24

statement of undisputed facts at least five days before the conference. The finalized joint statement of

25

undisputed facts SHALL include all facts that the parties agree, for purposes of the motion, may be

26

deemed true. In addition to the requirements of Local Rule 260, the moving party shall file the joint

27

statement of undisputed facts.

28

In the notice of motion the moving party SHALL certify that the parties have met and conferred
4

1

as ordered above, or set forth a statement of good cause for the failure to meet and confer. Failure to

2

comply may result in the motion being stricken.

3

VII.

Pre-Trial Conference Date

4

April 17, 2017, at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 5 before Judge Drozd.

5

The parties are ordered to file a Joint Pretrial Statement pursuant to Local Rule 281(a)(2).

6

The parties are further directed to submit a digital copy of their pretrial statement in Word format,

7

directly to Judge Drozd's chambers, by email at [e-mail].
Counsels' attention is directed to Rules 281 and 282 of the Local Rules of Practice for the

8
9

Eastern District of California, as to the obligations of counsel in preparing for the pre-trial conference.

10

The Court will insist upon strict compliance with those rules. In addition to the matters set forth in the

11

Local Rules the Joint Pretrial Statement shall include a Joint Statement of the case to be used by the

12

Court to explain the nature of the case to the jury during voir dire.

13

VIII. Trial Date
June 13, 20172, at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 5 before the Honorable Dale A. Drozd, United States

14
15

District Court Judge.

16

A.

This is a jury trial.

17

B.

Counsels' Estimate of Trial Time: 10-12 days.

18

C.

Counsels' attention is directed to Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of

19

California, Rule 285.

20

IX.

Settlement Conference

21

A Settlement Conference is scheduled for March 24, 2017 at 1:30 p.m. before the Honorable

22

Jennifer L. Thurston and the United States District Courthouse located at 510 19th Street, Bakersfield,

23

CA. If any party prefers the settlement conference be conducted by a judicial officer not assigned

24

to this case, that party SHALL notify the Court at least 60 days in advance of the conference to

25

allow a different judicial officer to be assigned.

26
27
28

2

Mr. Weakley has another set for trial on June 19, 2017, which may present a conflict for this trial. However,
given his heavy trial calendar, trial dates are not available for him until September 2017 or later. Thus, the Court
selected this trial date with the understanding that Mr. Weakley may need to seek a continuance of the trial date if his
other matter, which was previously scheduled, does not resolve.

5

1

Unless otherwise permitted in advance by the Court, the attorneys who will try the case shall

2

appear at the Settlement Conference with the parties and the person or persons having full authority

3

to negotiate and settle the case on any terms3 at the conference. Consideration of settlement is a

4

serious matter that requires preparation prior to the settlement conference. Set forth below are the

5

procedures the Court will employ, absent good cause, in conducting the conference.

6

At least 21 days before the settlement conference, Plaintiff SHALL submit to Defendant via

7

fax or e-mail, a written itemization of damages and a meaningful4 settlement demand which includes a

8

brief explanation of why such a settlement is appropriate. Thereafter, no later than 14 days before the

9

settlement conference, Defendant SHALL respond, via fax or e-mail, with an acceptance of the offer or

10

with a meaningful counteroffer, which includes a brief explanation of why such a settlement is

11

appropriate.

12

If settlement is not achieved, each party SHALL attach copies of their settlement offers to their

13

Confidential Settlement Conference Statement, as described below. Copies of these documents shall

14

not be filed on the court docket.
CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT

15
16

At least five court days before the Settlement Conference, the parties shall submit, directly to

17

Judge Thurston's chambers by e-mail to [e-mail], a Confidential Settlement

18

Conference Statement. The statement should not be filed with the Clerk of the Court nor served on

19

any other party, although the parties may file a Notice of Lodging of Settlement Conference

20

Statement. Each statement shall be clearly marked "confidential" with the date and time of the

21

Settlement Conference indicated prominently thereon.

22

The Confidential Settlement Conference Statement shall include the following:

23

A.

A brief statement of the facts of the case.

24

B.

A brief statement of the claims and defenses, i.e., statutory or other grounds upon which

25
26
27
28

3

Insurance carriers, business organizations, and governmental bodies or agencies whose settlement agreements
are subject to approval by legislative bodies, executive committees, boards of directors or the like shall be represented by a
person or persons who occupy high executive positions in the party organization and who will be directly involved in the
process of approval of any settlement offers or agreements. To the extent possible the representative shall have the
authority, if he or she deems it appropriate, to settle the action on terms consistent with the opposing party's most recent
demand.
4
“Meaningful” means that the offer is reasonably calculated to settle the case on terms acceptable to the offering
party. “Meaningful” does not include an offer which the offering party knows will not be acceptable to the other party.

6

1

the claims are founded; a forthright evaluation of the parties' likelihood of prevailing on

2

the claims and defenses; and a description of the major issues in dispute.

3

C.

A summary of the proceedings to date.

4

D.

An estimate of the cost and time to be expended for further discovery, pretrial and trial.

5

E.

The relief sought.

6

F.

The party's position on settlement, including present demands and offers and a history of
past settlement discussions, offers and demands.

7
8

X.

Request for Bifurcation, Appointment of Special Master, or other
Techniques to Shorten Trial

9
10

The parties disagree as to whether the trial should be trifurcated (with individual liability,

11

Monell liability and punitive damages liability all tied separately) or bifurcated (individual liability and

12

Monell liability tried together with the issue of punitive damages tried after). The parties will raise this

13

issue in their joint pretrial conference statement.

14

XI.

There are no pending related matters.

15
16
17

Related Matters Pending

XII.

Compliance with Federal Procedure
All counsel are expected to familiarize themselves with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

18

and the Local Rules of Practice of the Eastern District of California, and to keep abreast of any

19

amendments thereto. The Court must insist upon compliance with these Rules if it is to efficiently

20

handle its increasing case load and sanctions will be imposed for failure to follow the Rules as provided

21

in both the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of

22

California.

23

XIV. Effect of this Order

24

The foregoing order represents the best estimate of the court and counsel as to the agenda most

25

suitable to dispose of this case. The trial date reserved is specifically reserved for this case. If the

26

parties determine at any time that the schedule outlined in this order cannot be met, counsel are ordered

27

to notify the court immediately of that fact so that adjustments may be made, either by stipulation or by

28

subsequent status conference.
7

1

The dates set in this Order are considered to be firm and will not be modified absent a

2

showing of good cause even if the request to modify is made by stipulation. Stipulations

3

extending the deadlines contained herein will not be considered unless they are accompanied by

4

affidavits or declarations, and where appropriate attached exhibits, which establish good cause

5

for granting the relief requested.

6

Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions.

7
8
9
10

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

April 5, 2016

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
8