Doe v. County of Kern et al

Filing 92

ORDER GRANTING 88 Stipulation Extending the Briefing Schedule, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 6/10/2017. Plaintiff's brief due by 6/14/2017; defendants' response due by 6/28/2017; plaintiff's reply due by 7/3/2017. (Hall, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11 JANE DOE, an individual,
Plaintiff,

12
13

Case No. 1:15-cv-01641 -JLT
ORDER GRANTING THE STIPULATION
EXTENDING THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE

vs.
(Doc. 88)

14 COUNTY OF KERN, a municipality,
GEORGE ANDERSON, an individual,
15 and DOES 1-10,
16
Defendants.
17
18

The parties filed a stipulation regarding the deadlines to file the briefs regarding bifurcation.

19 (Doc. 88) Unfortunately, the Court was unable to address the stipulation in the 24 hours provided
20 by counsel before plaintiff’s brief was otherwise due. Thus, plaintiff has filed her brief (Doc. 90)
21 already. In any event, the Court GRANTS the stipulation as follows:
22

1.

Plaintiff’s brief, originally due June 9, 2017, SHALL be filed no later than June 14,

23 2017. Thus, to the extent plaintiff wishes to file an amended brief after the informal conference on
24 June 12, 2017, she may do so;
25

2.

Defendants’ response, originally due June 23, 2017, SHALL be filed no later than

26 June 28, 2017;
27

3.

Plaintiff’s brief in reply, originally due June 30, 2017, SHALL be filed no later than

28

1

1 July 3, 2017.
2
3
4

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

June 10, 2017

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
PROPOSED ORDER