Inviron Technologies, Inc. v. Western States International, Inc. et al
Filing
32
ORDER DENYING Motion to Stay Discovery By Protective Order and to Continue Mandatory Scheduling Conference 27 , signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/4/16: The motion is denied as moot and the hearing noticed for January 19, 2016, is vacated. (Hellings, J)
1
2
3
4
.
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
INVIRON TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
No. 1:15-cv-01643-DAD-JLT
v.
WESTERN STATES INTERNATIONAL,
INC. et al.,
Defendants.
16
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO STAY
DISCOVERY BY PROTECTIVE ORDER
AND TO CONTINUE MANDATORY
SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
(Doc. No. 27)
17
On December 22, 2015, defendants Western States International, Inc. and Ingrid Aliet-
18
19
Gass moved to stay discovery and to continue the initial scheduling conference in this case, which
20
was then set for February 12, 2016. (Doc. No. 27.) On December 29, 2015, an order issued
21
continuing the initial scheduling conference to April 12, 2016 at 9:00 a.m. before Magistrate
22
Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. (Doc. No. 30.)
In light of the order re-setting the initial scheduling conference, and pursuant to Federal
23
24
Rule Civil Procedure 26(d)(1) (prohibiting discovery before the parties have conferred as required
25
by Rule 26(f)), defendants’ motion to stay discovery and to continue the initial scheduling
26
/////
27
/////
28
/////
1
1
conference (Doc. No. 27) is denied as moot and the hearing noticed for January 19, 2016, is
2
vacated.1
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
Dated:
January 4, 2016
DALE A. DROZD
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
Defendants have moved to dismiss and/or remand this action and noticed those motions for
hearing before the undersigned on February 16, 2016 at 9:30 a.m., well before the initial
scheduling conference now set for April 12, 2016, before Magistrate Judge Thurston.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?