Olive v. Narayan

Filing 10

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why Action Should Not Be Dismissed for Failure to Follow Court Order and Failure to Prosecute, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 4/7/16: Thirty-Day Response Deadline. (Hellings, J)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

DAMIEN DWAYNE OLIVE,

11

Plaintiff,

12

v.

13

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR
FAILURE TO FOLLOW COURT ORDER
AND FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

NARAYAN,

14

Case No. 1:15-cv-01645 DLB

Defendant.
_____________________________________/

THIRTY-DAY RESPONSE DEADLINE
15
Plaintiff Damien Dwayne Olive (“Plaintiff”), a state inmate in the custody of the California

16

17 Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this
1
18 civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed this action on October 30, 2015.

On February 10, 2016, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint and dismissed it with leave

19

20 to amend. Plaintiff was ordered to file an amended complaint within thirty (30) days. Over thirty
21 (30) days have passed and he has failed to file an amended complaint or otherwise communicate
22 with the Court.
Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, if any he has, why this action

23

24 should not be dismissed for failure to follow a Court order and failure to prosecute. Plaintiff
25 SHALL file a response to this order within thirty (30) days from the date of service. Plaintiff may
26 ///
27 ///
28

1

Plaintiff consented to the jurisdiction of the United States Magistrate Judge on November 12, 2016.

1 also comply with this order by filing an amended complaint in accordance with the February 10,
2 2016, order.
3

Failure to respond to this order will result in dismissal of this action.

4
5
6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Dennis

April 7, 2016

L. Beck

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2