Morales v. City of Bakersfield, et al.
Filing
30
ORDER CLOSING CASE, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 12/27/2016. CASE CLOSED. (Hall, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ARTURO MORALES,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, et al.,
15
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:15-cv-1652 JLT
ORDER CLOSING THE CASE
(Doc. 29)
16
On December 23, 2016, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss the action. (Doc. 29)
17
18
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 provides that “the plaintiff may dismiss an action
19
without a court order by filing: . . . a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have
20
appeared.”. . .” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a). Once such a notice has been filed, an order of the Court is not
21
required to make the dismissal effective. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose,
22
111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this
23
action in light of the notice of dismissal with prejudice filed and properly signed pursuant to Rule
24
41(a).
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
December 27, 2016
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?