Cisneros v. Hernandez, et al.

Filing 17

ORDER DISMISSING This Action Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 5/18/16: The Clerk is directed to close this case. (CASE CLOSED)(Hellings, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ERICK CISNEROS, Plaintiff, 12 ORDER DISMISSING THIS ACTION PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 4(m) v. 13 14 Case No. 1:15-cv-01658-LJO-BAM-PC R. HERNANDEZ, Defendant. 15 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 18 § 1983. 19 This action was initiated by civil complaint filed in Kings County Superior Court on 20 October 14, 2015. Plaintiff, represented by John Kolfschoten of the Law Office of John 21 Kolfschoten, named as Defendants the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation 22 (CDCR) and Correctional Officer Ruben Hernandez. On October 30, 2015, Defendant CDCR 23 removed the action to this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a). The Notice of Removal 24 indicated that service on Defendant Hernandez had not been effected. Defendant CDCR filed a 25 motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Plaintiff did not oppose 26 the motion, or file objections to the findings and recommendations that the motion be granted. 27 On February 18, 2016, an order was entered by the District Court, adopting the findings and 28 recommendations, dismissing Defendant CDCR. 1 1 On February 22, 2016, an order to show cause was entered, directing Plaintiff to show 2 cause why this action should not be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) 3 for failure to timely serve the summons and complaint. Plaintiff has not filed a response to the 4 order to show cause, nor has he otherwise been in contact with the Court. 5 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed pursuant Federal 6 Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) for Plaintiff’s failure to timely serve the summons and complaint. 7 The Clerk is directed to close this case. 8 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____ May 18, 2016 UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?