Martin v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 17

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why Plaintiff's Social Security Appeal Should Not be Deemed Unopposed: the Court modified the briefing schedule in this action at Defendants request. (Doc. 16). Pursuant to this order, Defendants opposition was to be file d on or before September 14, 2016. To date, no opposition has been filed. Accordingly, Defendant is HEREBY ORDERED to SHOW CAUSE why Plaintiffs Social Security appeal should not be deemed unopposed and why sanctions should not issue for Defendants failure to comply with the Courts order. Defendant shall file its written response to this order to show cause on or before October 18, 2016. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 10/11/2016. (Herman, H)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

JAMES KEITH MARTIN,
Plaintiff,

9
10
11

Case No. 1:15-cv-1660-BAM
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
PLAINTIFF’S SOCIAL SECURITY
APPEAL SHOULD NOT BE DEEMED
UNOPPOSED

v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

RESPONSE DUE October 18, 2016
Defendant.

12
13
14

On August 19, 2016, the Court modified the briefing schedule in this action at

15 Defendant’s request. (Doc. 16). Pursuant to this order, Defendant’s opposition was to be filed on
16 or before September 14, 2016. To date, no opposition has been filed.
17

Accordingly, Defendant is HEREBY ORDERED to SHOW CAUSE why Plaintiff’s

18 Social Security appeal should not be deemed unopposed and why sanctions should not issue for
19 Defendant’s failure to comply with the Court’s order. Defendant shall file its written response to
20 this order to show cause on or before October 18, 2016.
21
22
23

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Barbara

October 11, 2016

A. McAuliffe

_

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

24
25
26
27
28

1