Maria Teresa Cisneros-Bello v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 28

ORDER AWARDING Motion for Attorney's Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act, Pursuant to the Terms of the Parties' Stipulation; ORDER Terminating as Moot Plaintiff's Motion for Fees 24 , signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 7/27/2017. (Hall, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 MARIA TERESA CISNEROS-BELLO, Plaintiff, 11 12 13 v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL1, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 14 Defendant. 15 16 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:15-cv-01698 - JLT ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEY’S FEES UNDER TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, PURSUANT TO THE TERMS OF THE PARTIES’ STIPULATION ORDER TERMINATING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR FEES (Doc. 24) On July 26, 2017, Maria Teresa Cisneros-Bello and Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner 17 of Social Security, stipulated for the award and payment of attorney’s fees and costs pursuant to the 18 Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). (Doc. 27) The filing of this stipulation moots the 19 motion for fees previously filed by Plaintiff. (Doc. 24) Accordingly, the Court ORDERS: 20 1. AWARDED fees in the total amount of $3,400; and 21 22 Subject to the terms of the parties’ stipulation, Plaintiff Maria Teresa Cisneros-Bello is 2. Plaintiff’s motion for attorney fees (Doc. 24) is terminated as MOOT. 23 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 27, 2017 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 1 28 Nancy A. Berryhill is now the Acting Commissioner of Social Security. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court substitutes Nancy A. Berryhill for her predecessor, Carolyn W. Colvin, as the defendant. 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?