Maria Teresa Cisneros-Bello v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
28
ORDER AWARDING Motion for Attorney's Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act, Pursuant to the Terms of the Parties' Stipulation; ORDER Terminating as Moot Plaintiff's Motion for Fees 24 , signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 7/27/2017. (Hall, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
MARIA TERESA CISNEROS-BELLO,
Plaintiff,
11
12
13
v.
NANCY A. BERRYHILL1,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
14
Defendant.
15
16
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:15-cv-01698 - JLT
ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEY’S FEES
UNDER TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE
ACT, PURSUANT TO THE TERMS OF THE
PARTIES’ STIPULATION
ORDER TERMINATING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR FEES (Doc. 24)
On July 26, 2017, Maria Teresa Cisneros-Bello and Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner
17
of Social Security, stipulated for the award and payment of attorney’s fees and costs pursuant to the
18
Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). (Doc. 27) The filing of this stipulation moots the
19
motion for fees previously filed by Plaintiff. (Doc. 24) Accordingly, the Court ORDERS:
20
1.
AWARDED fees in the total amount of $3,400; and
21
22
Subject to the terms of the parties’ stipulation, Plaintiff Maria Teresa Cisneros-Bello is
2.
Plaintiff’s motion for attorney fees (Doc. 24) is terminated as MOOT.
23
24
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
July 27, 2017
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
26
27
1
28
Nancy A. Berryhill is now the Acting Commissioner of Social Security. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court substitutes Nancy A. Berryhill for her predecessor, Carolyn W. Colvin, as the defendant.
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?